[#1]
ALUMNI COEDUCATION CORRESPONDENCE


An alphabetical list of alumni who wrote the President (P), the Development
Office (D), the Alumni Office (A), the Alumni Board President (AB) or the Board
of Trustees through J. W. Whitehead (BT) follows. The date of the letter and
number of pages are given. Not included are letters to individual Board members
and those letters sent to the Pres. of the Alumni Board from Alumni Board members.

Adams, Carl, III, '71 BA, Birmingham, AL (1/11/84) ( 1 p.) BT
Shares sentiments of J. W. Warner's 12/7/83 letter. "our long established
and highly cherished traditions will stand under the present system." Letter
co-signed by his father, Carl Adams, Jr., non-alumnus, Lee Associate.

Adams, Justin G., '70 BA, '76 JD, Chicago, ILL. (12/83) (1 p.) P
Brief letter opposing coeducation. Does not believe demographic information
justifies change.

Alderson, John W., Jr., '28 BS, Forest City, Ark. (1/7/84) ( 3 pp.) P
"I feel there is some room for considering W&L a coeducational school.
W&L will not be the same to me, but I hope it will be better for the
students yet to come. I have faith and trust that you and the Trustees
will do what is best for W&L."

Allen, C. Edmonds, '65 BA, JD, N.Y.C., N.Y. (6/3/83) (2pp.) P
Reminisces about his time here. Talks of changes, states his father will
drop W&L as a beneficiary if school goes coed in his lifetime. In 12/27/83
letter to Trustees (copy to Alumni Board Pres.), expresses his strong opposition
and that he would not be a contributor if coed adopted.

Ambler, James C., '18 BA, Richmond, VA (11/30/83) (1 p.) P
In brief note expressing thanks for letter acknowledging his gift, he goes
"on record as completely opposed to making the undergraduate school coed."

Armstrong, Michael D., '77 BA, MBA, Mtn. View, CA (8/18/83) (3pp.) P
Comprehensive consideration of issues in coed question. Would regret
coeducation. Feels W&L views coeducation as "safety net" for current problems.
Feels W&L can meet and adapt to a changing society.

Ayers, Billy V., '40 BA, Sarasota, Fla. (12/13/83) (1 p.) P
In accord with J. W. Warner's ('41) letter to Alumni Bd. Pres. "If W&L gets
to the point where its very existence is at stake, ok, but I say table the issue.

Baker, Frederick L., III, '63 BS, MBA, Riverside, CT (12/30/83) ( 2 pp.) BT
"I am strongly opposed to undergraduate coeducation at W&L. Until the situation
becomes clearer, I am deferring my normal contribution to the Alumni Fund."

Baker, Seth N., '38 BA, Chatham, NJ (12/83) ( 1 p. ) BT
Opposed to coed, concerning demographics, he feels "we can be effective with
an increasing mix of C students. Eisenhower college was one, I believe."
Believes we will suffer in alumni support.

[pb]

Baker, W. Nat, '67 BA, San Francisco, CA (11/4/83) (2 pp.) P
Cogent letter recognizing traditions and pressures for change. "Borrowing
from Fulbright, I think W&L is faced with old myths and new realities."
"Washington and Lee must change if it is to survive and prosper."

Baldwin, John R., '50 BA, Bethesda, MD (7/31/83) (1 p.) P
Brief letter. Would "rather not hear the question of coeducation." Feels
"that coeducation at my W&L would be a breach of our pledge to tradition."

Bartenstein, Fred Jr., '39 BA, '41 JD, Mendham, NJ (11/7/83) (1 p.) D
Non-committal on issue. Applauds the University taking on the issue. Does
not feel alumni can be given all necessary information for a reasoned decision.
A 12/31 letter to Alumni Pres. expresses his feeling alumni are opposed to coed.

Battle, John D., Jr., '34 BA, Cleveland, OH (1/4/84) ( 1 p.) P
"I strongly favor adopting coeducation. I hope the Board of Trustees will
approve coeducation at their meeting in May."

Baugher, W. Hugh, '68 BA, ID, Baltimore, MD (11/10/83) ( 1 p.) A
Disturbed by what he feels is an anti-fraternity, pro-co-education stance by
leadership. "W&L has a tradition and a unique situation, and I think changes
should be entered into under advisement."

Beall, W. Upton, '51 BA, Tyler, TX (11/15/83) (1½ pp.) D
Expresses no opinion. Reports on alumni sentiment he's heard. "The timing of
this particular study is particularly poor." Feels issue is being rushed without
fully understanding traditions or the basic character of the University. In
a Jan. 5, '84, letter: "take a good look at this particular check because at
present my feeling is that if the school goes coed this will be the last one
you will see with this signature and amount."

Bierer, James H., '40 AB,Boothbay , ME (12/19/83) ( 1 p.) AB
One sentence note: "I am not aware of any reason why W&L should go coed,
and I am opposed to searching for one."

Blair, C. Edward, '40 BA, Florida Keys (12/26/83) ( 1 p.) AB
Concurs with J. W. Warner's ('41) Letter to Alumni Board President. "Would
be a mistake to tamper with the formula that has been successful for W&l
since its beginnings." Strongly opposed.

Blanchard, James A. III, '72 JD, Charlottesville, VA (11/10/83) ( 1 p.) D
Feels University should retain all-male tradition. Ramifications of change
are incalculable. Feels no basis on which to embark on a major and irreversible
project. Had also written on May 5, 1983, in opposition.

Boardman, John K., Jr., '51 BS, Bedford, VA (11/23/83) ( 1 p.) P
Supports coed. "I feel it is the right move at the right time for Washington
and Lee and I will support it in any way I can."

Bond, T. Talbott, '51 BA, Baltimore, MD (12/28/83) ( 1 p.) P
Supports coeducation. "W&L would become stronger by being coed for the reasons
you have stated if the student body of men does not diminish in number with
the acceptance of women."


-2-

[pb]

Bourdrez, Alexander, '76 BA, Millbrook, NY (1/4/84) ( 1 p.) P
Supports coed. "Turning coed would rid W&L of a detrimental, archaic tradition
while strengthening others of excellence in academics and of developing
personal dignity, integrity, and humility."

Bradford, Nancyjean, '83 JD, Abingdon, VA (10/83) ( 1 p.) A
"I wholeheartedly support elimination of the current discriminatory admissions
policy of the undergraduate school."

Broders, A. Compton, Jr., '38 BA, Temple, TX (no date) ( 1 p.) AB
Opposed to coed. "Why change or modify W&L's identity by going coeducational."

Buell, Colin K., '72 BS, Strongsville, O. (1/6/84) ( 2½ pp. ) P
Opposes coed. Feels it would a long-term problem. "Coeducation would destroy
traditions that have withstood the test of time for over two hundred and
thirty-five years."

Burchenal, Ralph R., '54 BA, Cincinnati, OH (12/83) ( 1 p.) P
Two sentences expressing opposition. "Would be a move to mediocrity. We're
unique - let's keep it that way."

Burks, Martin P., '32 JD, Roanoke, VA. (10/12/83) ( 1 p.) P
With coed, concerned with the insistence of young men and women living together
in dorms (i.e. new dorm at VPI). Suggests alternative of an MS or MA for both
men and women. Same sentiment expressed in 12/6/83 letter to Alumni Board Pres.

Caldwell, Manley P., Jr., '58 BA, '60 JD, Palm Beach, Fla. (10/11/83) ( 1 p.) P
"I strongly urge the Board to decide on coeducation. All-male admission policy
is totally out of step with the times."

Calvert, George E., Jr., '73 AB, '76 JD, Richmond, VA (11/83) ( 1 p.) P
Opposed to coed. Feels move to coed is to solve a presumed problem. Would
like to see a poll of alumni.

Cavaliere, Paul C., '48 JD, New Britian, CT (11/4/83) ( 1 p.) P
One sentence note. "Admitting women would only destroy a 235-year tradition
and not benefit the University at all."

Chapin, Robert S., '31 BA, Roseville, CA (12/22/83) ( 1 p.) AB
"Seconds" J. W. Warner's ('41) letter of 12/7. "His letter contains rational
and (to me) valid argument against such a move."

Chapman, Benjamin L., '64 BA, Lexington, VA (12/11/83) ( 1 p.) P
Brief letter supports coed. "Because we now have the potential to be one of
America's outstanding colleges, we no longer can be satisfied being merely a
fine old Southern bastion living on memories and charm. We now have an
obligation to excel also."

Christopher, Thomas W., '39 BA, University, Ala. (11/7/83) ( 1 p.) P
Brief note opposing coed. "The future of W&L lies in maintaining that certain
mystique and image."


-3-

[pb]

Conrad, George D., '27 JD, Harrisonburg, VA (11/83) ( 1 p.) P
Brief letter stating "I hope sincerely you will resist the temptation to support
the co-ed movement."

Cook, David F., '61 BA, Winter Park, FL (12/31/83) P
Opposes coed. Note to JDW on Annual Fund card. "W&L's uniqueness sets
the school apart. Let's continue to be unique."

Cooper, Frederick E., '64 BA, Thomasville, GA (11/4/83) ( 1 p.) P
Prefers single-sex, but has "not formed a negative opinion" on the question
of coed. Feels it imperative that alumni and students are fully informed of
deliberations and encouraged to comment upon them.

Cornbrooks, Ernest I., III, '67 AB, JD, Salisbury, MD (1/10/84) ( 4 pp. ) P
Extensive, thoughtful review of all issues. Does not believe time for coed
has arrived. Demographics and arguments derived from them not convincing.
Feels we could be 10% smaller and not suffer. "In my experience as an A-AP
representative, the greatest concern expressed by prospective students and
their parents is the cost of a W&L education." Feels that "women should be
admitted because the education of women is the proper thing for W&L to do."
Believes it would be an insult to women to admit them for any other, self-
serving purpose.

Couch, Robert M., '78 BS, '81 JD, Wash., D.C. (7/25/83) ( 1 p.) P
Votes against coed, but "my reasons are sentimental rather than analytical."
Feels the Board "will have alumni support regardless of the decision they reach."

Day, G. Richard, '41 BA, MBA, Louisville, KY (1/19/84) ( 1 p. ) P
Has heard no alumnus speak in favor of coed. "We have something unique -
let's keep it. Change for change's sake does not accomplish anything."

de Coligny, Calvert G., Jr., '61 BA, Baltimore, MD (12/20/83) ( 1 p.) D
Has "mixed feelings." Finds it "hard to believe that W&L or Lexington could
accomodate the girls or that the girls could civilize or socially make
Minks more respectable."

DeVaney, Robert C., '65 BS, Houston, TX ( 1/5/84) ( 1 p.) P
Opposes coed. Believes we will be able to survive drop in population among
prospective students until the "upswing". Wants to protect our uniqueness.
"Being all male is a significant factor in making it unique."

Dickenson, Daniel D., '54 BA, BD, Va. Beach, VA (11/15/83) ( 1 p.) P
"I have long favored the idea of co-education for Washington and Lee and will
certainly support a move in that direction."

Dickinson, H. Tyndall, '39 BA, '41 JD, Sweet Home, Ark. (12/13/83) ( 2 pp.) D
Responds to JDW's background paper. "I believe W&L should become co-educational
for all the reasons given. I hate the change, but I desire the college to
maintain its hard-earned academic excellence."

Dismuke, Fred W., '22-'24, Midland, GA (11/83) ( 1 p.) D
Opposes. One sentence: "Please don't ruin our wonderful school by such a move."


-4-

[pb]

Ditto, Ben W., '43 BA, Houston, TX (11/7/83) ( 1 p.) P
Opposes coed. Cannot believe we've had an enrollment problem. "Lexington
is not ready for a coed college. It would be a shame and a disgrace to see
this change."

DuBose, Beverly M., III, '62 BS, Atlanta, GA (12/21/83) ( 3 pp.) P
Writes for Atlanta Chapter of Alumni Association. Concerned "adoption of coed
concept will alter the social and intellectual environment which has resulted
in an amalgam of shared, unique experiences we loosely term the W&L tradition."
Points to financial considerations. Urges greater recruitment efforts,
emphasizing financial aid, and strengthening alumni recruiting efforts. Alumni
"guided" by adage, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

Dunn, Melville I., Jr., '19-'23, Jensen Beach, FL (1/3/84) ( 1 p. ) P
"I don't think W&L should go coed". If it does, "W&L could not have a finer
pilot to take it thru the period than John Wilson."

Essex, Richard S., '80 BA, N.Y.C., N.Y. (9/7/83) ( 1 p.) P
Feels slight trepidation about coed, but expresses confidence in University
leadership and that whatever the decision, it will be the right one. Calls
for redefining fraternities' roles.

Farrar, James D., Jr., '74, BA, Alexandria, VA (1/23/84) ( 2 pp. ) P
Supports coeducation. Views from position as teacher, coach, admissions
staff at an all-male boarding school. Attaches "unscientific" poll of
EHS seniors on their attitudes on coed issue. Feels W&L "missing out
on some great young people" - males we are not reaching now, and women
who would bring not only intellectual ability, but a strengthening of
the quality of life at the University.

Ferguson, James C., '74 BS, Edmond, OK ( 1.5.84 ) ( 1 p. ) P
Opposes coed. Fears loss of uniqueness, "The school I attended was truly
unique because of the all male atmosphere."

Fletcher, C. Russell, III, '74 BA, MBA, Kansas City, MO (1/16/84) ( 1 p. ) P
Writes in support of coed and applauds background paper reproduced in alumni
magazine. "I am convinced if W&L is to remain an important and collective
university, it must admit women as students."

Flowers, William H., '33 BA, Thomasville, GA (1/11/84) ( 1 p.) P
"Coeducation is not needed; and if we go that route, many traditional years
of excellence will be lost."

Fulton, Rufus A., '26 BS, Lancaster, PA (11/21/83) ( 1 p.) P
Opposed to coed. Do not change for change's sake. "It would be cruel to
tamper with something as fine and prestigious as W&L."

Gabler, James M., '53 BA, '55 JD, Baltimore, MD (11/2/83) ( 1 p.) P
Supports coeducation. Changing society demands admission of women.

Garrison, W.E., III, '76 BA, MA, Richmond, VA (10/20/83) ( 1 p.) P
Writes thanks for Leadership Conference. No preference on coed given.
Offers counsel from the alumni. A 1/4/84 letter to the President is detailed


-5-

[pb]

cogent consideration of all issues. He states preference for coed, but
confidence in leadership. Wants, above all, a first rate academic institution.

Gay, Charles S., '56 BA, Long Island, NY (11/10/83) ( 1 p.) D
Supports coed. "I cannot overemphasize my own feelings of the need for
coeducation at Washington and Lee." Feels warranted by demographics and
student's desires for coed.

Giblin, Gerrald A., Jr., '81 BA, Alexandria, VA (11/18/83) ( 1 p.) P
Strident opposition to coeducation. Feels we can survive w/o 1300 undergraduates.
We should increase marketing efforts. What W&L offers is unique today.
"Solution to preserving W&L does not lie in becoming coed."

Gottwald, John D., '77 BA, Richmond, VA (12/13/83) ( 1 p.) P
Brief letter stating that "I believe with coeducation W&L would have the potential
for becoming the unquestioned superior school of the state, and, possibly, one
one the finest in the country."

Gottwald, William M., '70 BS, Richmond, VA (12/83) ( 1 p.) P
Sent a summary of colleges applied to and attended prepared by collegiate
schools in Richmond." This alumnus votes for coeducation."

Gregory, Carlyle, Jr., '75, Alexandria, VA (1/8/84) ( 1 p.) BT
Brief, but strongly opposed letter. Challenges demographics. Refuses "to
believe that out of 230 million people we can't find 400 qualified young men.
We will have to work harder. I'll be glad to help." In 1/8/84 letter to
President Wilson, expresses same sentiment.

Greif, Brian S., '72 BA, JD, Austin, TX (1/9/84) ( 2 pp. ) P
Opposes coeducation. Feels support of coeducation shows an "incomprehension
of the tradition of W&L. A change to coeducation would be nothing less
than short-sighted."

Griffith, Robert S., III, '83 BA, Altanta, GA (12/7/83) ( 1 p.) P
Does not feel W&L is "missing its share of qualified applicants." "Unless
W&L is unable to survive and remain competitive for top students, it should
not become coed."

Guroian, Michael, '74 BA, Stamford, CT (1/1/84) ( 2 pp. ) BT
Feels background paper is "Whitewash of recurring clarion call to embrace
radical change at W&L." States "I'll be damned if a simple statistical
extrapolation will push me to such extremes. An all male W&L can have a
place in our future when we meet the challenge."

Harp, Reno S., III, '54 BA, '56 JD, Richmond, VA (11/16/83) ( ½ p.) D
Only the Board qualified to make this decision. "Let me assure you that
whatever action is taken, I will support it."

Harrell, C. Miner, '71 BA, JD, Pensacola, FL ( 1/9/84 ) ( 1½ p.) BT
Writes as Pres. of Alumni Chapter. Polled 26 active alumni there, sending
Warner and Wilson letters. Twenty-four responded and were opposed to co-
education. Were surprised there is an admissions problem. Before they
could approve such a change, would have to be convinced there is no other
way to prevent W&L from becoming a second rate school.


-6-

[pb]

Harrison, George W., '32-'34, Henderson, N.C. (11/5/83) ( 1 p.) D
Opposes coed. "Having females on campus would elminate all of the tradition
that I am so justly proud of at W&L." Could not continue as Class Agent if
W&L becomes coed.

Hausrath, Ralph A., '40 BA, MS, New Berlin, NY (10/83) ( 2 pp.) A
Opposes coed. Should not "tinker" with success unless need is dire. Feels
we could shrink a bit and still make it. Would not like to be there when
"Washington and Lee's persons fall in line."

Hendrix, James R., '26 BS, Birmingham, Ala (12/29/83) ( 2 pp.) D
Strongly opposed to coed, Feels USNWR article is approval of our status, and
it would be folly to change. Would regret "plunging into a program that
would drastically change fundamental and traditionally loved aspects of our
University."

Herman, John D., '78 BA, Fairfax, VA (12/27/83) ( 1 p. ) P
Coeducation "would only improve the quality of life at the University. Rarely
did I come across healthy, daily, respectful relationships between men and
women on campus." Demographics aside, he "would urge the adoption of coed
at W&L if only to change the unhealthy social attitudes between men and women
on campus."

Herndon, Michael N., '62 BA, Columbus, GA (10/28/83) ( 2 pp.) P
Opposes coed. Feels reasons so far presented are insufficient. Regrets
haste in presenting issue. Urges open dialogue with all W&L constituencies
during decision process. He states that alumni feel "this decision has been
made in accordance with educational philosophy and will be rationalized on
the basis of declining enrollment.

Hewit, Russell L., '74 BA, '77 JD, Westfield, NJ (12/1/83) ( 3 pp.) P
Strong support of coeducation. Felt all-male ten years ago met his needs.
Cites changes socially and intellectually from which he concludes "there is
only one meritorious position on the issue. Washington and Lee should be
coeducational."

Hinkle, Samuel D., IV, '69 BA, JD, San Francisco, CA (1/11/84) ( 1 p. ) P
Just received Nov. Alumni Magazine. "I am very pleased to learn that
W&L is again considering coeducation. I strongly support coeducation
and urge that it be implemented."

Holladay, J. MacD., '67 BA, Charleston, SC (11/11/83) ( 1½ p.) P
Hopes there is a positive role he can play in considerations. Ambivalent
on coed issue. Impressed by demographics, but "perhaps the risk to the
institution too great."

Hollinger, Andrew G., '73 BA, MS, Rochester, NY (12/29/83) ( 1½ p.) P
Thoughtful consideration of four factors (academic excellence) (social
preparation) (University's character)(the symbolic). Takes no stand.
"W&L will survive, and prosper, I'm sure whatever the decision."


-7-

[pb]

Hollins, Arthur, III, '51 BS, Lake Charles, LA (12/15/83) ( 1 p.) P
Two sentences expressing opposition. Hopes views of all alumni are considered
before decision.

Hollis, Samuel B., '51 BS, Memphis, Tenn (7/12/83) ( 1 p.) P
Opposes coed because "we have something unique and we don't have to follow
the crowd. I wanted you to hear from one very devoted, loyal alumnus who
is strongly opposed to coeducation."

Holmquist, Richard, '57 BS, PhD, Richmond, CA (1/9/84) ( 2 pp.) P
Responds to alumni magazine of November, JDW's background paper. Succinct
letter expressing his feeling that "the quality of maleness at W&L is in
today's world certainly an abnormal social milieu - it is a false game."

Holton, A. Linwood, Jr., '44 BA, Wash., D.C. (12/14/83) ( 1 p.) P
Positive support of coeducation. "I suggest that coeducation at Washington and Lee
is not only a necessary, but probably a very challenging, part of the future."

Hornor, Paul A., '31 BS, Clarksburg, WVa. (12/14/83) ( 1 p.) AB
Opposed to coed. "I agree wholeheartedly with Jack Warner's letter. I feel that
the morals of any good college is an absolute necessity to its continued success."

Hoyt, William D., '32 BA, '33 MA, Rockport, Mass (12/11/83) ( 3 pp.) P
Opposes coed. Doesn't feel we lack for applications. "We have something unique
at W&L, and I hope we don't take a chance of losing it."

Humphries, J.D., III, '66 BA, '69 JD, Atlanta, GA ( 1/12/84 ) ( 3 pp. ) P
Urges professional market research "as to the product that W&L offers potential
college students. Is there a market for an all male institution?" Says
alumnus Claibourne Darden of Atlanta heads Darden Research Corp. "The
Trustees have a duty to assure themselves through professional research that
a market exists, or that it does not in sufficient numbers to assure quality."

Hunt, Douglas H., '75 BA, Dallas, TX (12/22/83) ( 3 pp. ) P
Thoughtful letter opposing coeducation. Concerned with cost - alumni response
to fund-raising required, loss of unique and interesting character. Concludes
- "I do not believe coeducation wold be a disaster for W&L. However, I do
believe it would be a mistake because the benefits would be slim and costs
substantial."

Hutchins, Christopher, '60 BA, Bangor, Me (11/83) ( 1½ p.) D
Feels proper admissions marketing can fill the gap created by diminishing
college-age population. Concerned with "the absolutely atrocious record of
female giving to schools, colleges, and universities." Feels coed would be
"short-sighted."

Ide, R. William, III, '62 BA, JD, Atlanta, GA (1/20/84) ( 1 p. ) P
States no preference. Has heard grumbling in Atlanta about coed. At first
agreed all-male best, but read JDW's report in Alumni Magazine. Realizes
things are different concerning supply and demand. "Regardless of the
ultimate decision, you have seen that the leadership role has been fulfilled.
Congratulations on a job well done and you have my best wishes as deliberations
unfold."


-8-

[pb]

Jackson, B. Davis, '76 BA, New Braunfels, TX (11/28/83) ( 2 pp.) P
Wishes to remain unique. "To admit women is to alter the very essence and
identity of the institution."

Jackson, Clay T., '76 BA, Nashville, TN (11/18/83) ( 2 pp.) P
Thoughtful letter supporting coed. "If Trustees decide coeducation is best, it
will not be without tears, including my own, but I believe the primary concern
is to preserve the quality of students and education at W&L. Coeducation will
ensure and enhance this quality."

Jennings, James W., Jr., '65 BA, '72 JD, Roanoke, VA (10/19/83) ( 1 p.) P
Writes in thanks for Leadership Conference. "It is almost a necessity for W&L
to become a coed university if it is to regain its position as the best
college in the South."

Johns, Benjamin I., Jr., '78 BS, Bacova, VA ( 1/12/84 ) ( 1 p. ) P
Opposes coed. "Such a move would obviously cause a radical change in the
University that I know and support."

Johnson, Lawrence A.G., '55 BS, JD, Tulsa, OK (10/16/83) P
Stridently opposed to coed. "Have abandoned the most fundamental traditions,
that is, the utilization of a men's college to assure that women would not
be added as a distraction to the basic purposes of the University."

Jones, Hoyle C., '60 BA, N.Y.C.,N.Y. (12/5/83)
Voices strong opposition. "Such a move would cause a radical change in the
University, and I would view such a change as extremely undesirable."

Johnston, Henry P., '29 BA, Birmingha, AL (1/13/84) ( 1½ p. ) D
Opposes coed. Feels there is a place for the small, all-male college. "Like
most graduates I am perfectly happy with our school as it is. To change to
coed would be a drastic mistake."

Johnston, H. Reed, '28 BA, Sarasota, Fla. (11/27/83) ( 1 p.) D
"I am sad that economics have forced this decision upon us, but I am not
against it. Most assuredly, I don't want W&L to become a second rate institution."

Jungman, Robert F., '77 BS, JD, Wash., D.C. (11/22/83) ( 2 pp.) P
Supports uniqueness of all-male institution. Increased recruiting efforts by
staff and alumni can get us through the period of diminishing supply.

Kaplan, Sidmon J., '56 BA, Cleveland, OH (1/3/83) ( 1 p.) P
Strong support of coeducation and leadership. "The rigidity with which the
University has maintained an all-male institution has been overcome by social
change in our national and local communities. Its continued maintenance is
no longer prudent."

Keatley, Robert A., '75 BS, Kansas City, MO (10/31/83) ( 1½ pp.) P
Adamantly opposed to coed. Feels with increased staff and alumni recruiting
efforts, we can weather the "admissions crunch". Regrets haste with which he
feels issue is being decided. Urges adequate communication with alumni.

King, Robert L., '20-'22, BS,MD, Seattle, WA (12/30/83) ( 1 p. ) BT
Wishes to state "I do not think that such a move would take care of excessive


-9-

[pb]

student misbehavior or improve the standards of the University or the number
or quality of the applicants for admission,"

Kinney, Rufus D., '69 BA, MA, Montevallo, AL (1/18/84) ( 3 pp. ) P
Had preferred all-male as student, but now feels "that undergraduate
coeducation policy would be the best policy for the present and future."

Ladd, G. Russell, III, '57 BS, Mobile, Ala (11/4/83) ( 2 pp.) AB
No preference on issue given. Urges open dialogue with all. Alumni Assoc.
should be vehicle and arm of Board of Trustees - not an opinion-giving body.

Lassman, Malcolm, '60 BA, '63 JD, Wash., DC ( 1/13/84) ( 3 pp. ) P
Cogent letter supporting coed. "I support coeducation at W&L because I
don't believe we can survive as a vital and unique situation cherishing
academic excellence without admitting women. I'm concerned that sentimen-
tality is getting in the way of judgment of some of the leading alumni who
have recently communicated with you. This sentimentality is a type of
selfishness which ignores the reality of the 1980's and beyond. My two
sons — both outstanding students and gifted football players were accepted
at W&L. One enrolled in Yale and the other at Oberlin. The major reason
they did not seriously consider the offer from alma mater was because they
did not want to attend an all-male school."

Lawson, John R., Jr., '53 AB, '55 JD, Tampa, FL ( 1/4/84) ( 3 pp. ) P
Very personal evaluation of issues. Extremely thoughtful review of situation.
"It give me 'peculiar pleasure' ( in the words of Francis P. Gaines) to tell
you that if the Trustees see fit to change the policy, your paper, my reading
of it, and my ruminations on it, will have made Tommy Touchton's life
somewhat easier by getting one alumnus off his back."

Lee, Peter J., '60 BA, BD, Chapel Hill, NC (12/1/83) ( 1 p.) P
Thoughtful letter following a visit here with two prospective students. "First
reaction to coeducation is 'why change a good thing?' My deeper conviction is
a sense of pride and confidence in you and the Board. I want you to know my
deep interest and confidence in the process by which you and the Board reach
you decisions."

Lee, Robert E., '41 BA, MA, Ded, Pensacola, FL (1/6/84) ( 1 p. ) P
Supports coed. "W&L may have to face a reduction in alumni giving for at
least a few years. In the longer view, W&L will be the winner, and the rift
will heal."

Lee, Robert E., IV, '49 BS, Fairfax, VA (1/5/84) ( 1 p.) P
Opposes coed. "Being all male and giving a liberal arts education to all types
of students is an obligation that this institution should continue. I srongly urge
that you do everything in your power to head off this unnecessary change."

Lewis, R. Brooke, '76 BA, '83 JD, Dallas, TX (10/26/83) ( 2 pp.) P
Does not wish to change the essential tradition of all male in view of temporary
pressure. If W&L goes coed "it will cease to be W&L."


-10-

[pb]

Litzenburg, Thomas N., Jr., '57 BA,MA,PhD, Winston-Salem, NC (11/8/83) ( 2 pp. ) P
Incisive letter supporting coed, but indicating concerns to be met relating
to size, mix, curriculum, sex-bias. In responding to those seeking his view,
"I have said that the University simply cannot afford to remain an all male
institution, and argued that a review of the hard facts will bring most
reasonable people to the same conclusion."

Lynch, John P., '30 BA, MD, Richmond, VA (12/12/83) ( 1 p.) AB
Opposed to coed. Agrees 100% with J. W. Warner (12/7 letter) that W&L should
remain an all male university.

McClerkin, Hayes C., '53 BA, JD, Texarkana, Ark. (5/83) ( 1½ p.) P
"There may be economic and demographic reasons to which I am not privy, that
might indicate coeducational status for W&L is necessary. I hope not and that
W&L will retain its all-male status." Similar letter, 1/9/84, to Bd. of Trustees.

McCutcheon, Joseph B., '51 BS, Midlothian, VA (11/17/83) ( 1 p.) P
Brief letter stating that W&L "has always been a quality, first-class
institution and it it takes coeducation to keep it this way, then we should
take that route."

McLean, David J., '78 BA, JD, Los Angeles, CA (10/19/83) ( 3 pp.) P
Supports coeducation. "The future of W&L depends, in no small part, on our
decision to admit women to the undergraduate school of the University." States
that experiences recruiting students in L.A. led him to conclude "that W&L is
already an anachronism."

McMenamin, Joseph P., '74 BS, MD, JD, Upper Darby, PA (1/4/84) ( 2 pp.) P
Thoughtful letter opposing coeducation. Feels the population drop will move
upward in the 90's. Considers women would be distraction. "If the change is
made, I will cherish W&L in my heart, but I will grieve the loss of something that
can never be restored."

McMurran, Lewis A., '36, Newport News, VA (10/13/83) ( 1 p. ) P
"I personally feel that W&L should remain proud of its uniqueness in every
respect. I am sure we are better off as we are."

Maguire, John D., '53 BA, BD, PhD, Claremont, CA (1/3/84) ( 1 p. ) P
Pres. of Claremont Univ., was acting provost at Wesleyan during coeducation there.
The cases for coeducation are "I believe more compelling today. I wish you well
in this review and want you to know that this particular alumnus favors coeducation.

Martin, Everett A., '33-'35, Norfolk, VA (1/23/83) ( 1 p. ) P
Opposes coed. "W&L occupies a unique position in the educational field and in
order to maintain this position I very strongly feel the University should remain
as presently structured."

Martin, Roger S., '70 BS,JD, Charlottesville, VA (12/23/83) ( 1 p. ) P
"In favor coed as I did as a student. W&L's all-male policy contributes to an
unhealthy attitude that women are inferior or that their role in society should
be subservient to men's."

Mason, Harry C., '40 AB, '42 JD, Orange, VA (11/28/83) ( 1 p.) D
Opposed to coed. Urges stronger recruitment efforts. Concerned with costs
involved with the move. Fears alumni giving will wane.


-11-

[pb]

Maytham, Walter J., III, '53 BA, MBA, Lakeville, CT (12/28/83) (½ p.) AB
Opposed to coed. "I support the conclusion stated in Mr. Warner's letter
(12/7) and veto any movement designed to turn W&L coeducational."

Melton, Howard E., '36 BA, Okla, City, OK (12/4/83) ( 1 sent.) AB
"Please record my sentiments strongly against the coed idea."

Miller, Edgar B., '29—'31, Hawkins, TX (1/6/84) ( 1 sent.) BT
"Wish to voice my objection to making W&L a coeducational institution."

Missal, Michael J., '78 BS, Wash., D.C. (10/23/83) ( 1 p.) D
"I feel that coeducation is a necessary step for W&L to make if it is to
maintain, and hopefully strengthen, its place as one of the outstanding
academic institutions in the country."

Mitchell, Frank T., 5 BA, Naples, FL (12/12/83) ( 1 p.) BT
"The facts presented in Mr. J. W. Warner's letter (12/7/83) convinces me to agree
with his conclusions that W&L should continue as a male school."

Monroe, Douglas D., Jr., '55 BS, Kilmarnock, VA (11/9/83) ( 1 p.) P
Opposed to a change. "W&L is small and it would appear there is a niche for
300 to 400 young men east of the Mississippi who each year wish to attend a
quality, all male university such as Washington and Lee."

Moore, Robert H., Jr., '44 BA, MBA, JD, Bluefield, WVa (12/15/83) ( 1 p.) D
Opposed to coed. Pleased to see ranking in USNWR. "I hope that will scotch
anymore consideration of going co-ed."

Morgan, M. R., '76 BA, Wellesley, Mass (12/15/83) ) 1 p.) P
"I encourage you to adopt coeducation." Cites four reasons: (Women influential
in business, professions) (Women better disciplined) (Men miss important part
of college w/o women in residence) (Applicant pool shrinking; quality slipping).

Morse, Clinton S., '67 BS, JD, Roanoke, VA (10/4/83) ( 2 pp.) P
Supports coed because "all-male policy eliminates too many potential and
enthusiastic applicants" and "coed would go a long way toward creating a
better university atmosphere."

Muskin, R. Bennett, '82. BA, Philadelphia, PA (1/18/84) ( 1 p. ) P
Supports coeducation. Reacts strongly and negatively to his Class Agent's letter
requesting a donation and urging opposition to coeducation. Muskin concludes
- "when the first undergraduate woman registers for fall classes, I will gladly
send you my first donation."

Neil, John E., '38 BA, So. Pines, NC (12/17/83) ( 1½ pp.) AB
Discerning letter on coed issues. Decries social fabric at W&L, applauds
desire to cure - not convinced coed will solve it. All-male status might be
more a "drag" in future then a help. Doesn't feel we'll "disintegrate" under
any circumstances." I would vote for making standby plans for coed - then
vote again after at least a two-year interlude."

Patterson, Robert G., '48 BA, BD, Memphis, TN (1/7/84) ( 1 p. ) P
Strong support for coeducation. "My own experience as a student in both male
and coed institutions, and the comparison of the two in retrospect leads me


-12-

[pb]

to support coeducation unequivocally."

Paynter, S. Reed, '65A, Hockessin, DE (12/30/83) ( 1 p. ) P
No real preference. "So long as W&L maintains this lead in terms of product
differentiation, there will be sufficient qualified applicants, whether that
includes women or not."

Peterson, Jon, '61, Orlando, FL (1/11/84) ( 1 p. ) P
Brief letter opposes coeducation. "I hope the University sees fit to remain
all male. I find it hard to believe that a University with the high reputation
W&L enjoys would find it difficult to continue to get high quality students,
especially with the small size of the University and the Freshman Class."

Pifer, William H., '47, MD, Winchester, VA (1/21/84) ( 1 p.) P
"We all enjoyed your visit. I still favor the all-male character of the under-
graduate college. I have not been convinced that a change outweighs remaining
as is."

Plowman, Francis W., '24 BS, Swarthmore, PA (12/5/83) ( 1 p.) P
Supports coeducation largely on demographic information. "We should change
our policy and admit a limited number of women without delay."

Raines, Samuel L, '21 BA, MD, Memphis, TN (12/8/83) ( 1 p.) D
Opposed to coed. "I cannot believe we need to do this or to enlarge our student
body in order to attract an adequate number of outstanding students in the
foreseeable future."

Redford, James H., '76 BA, JD, Franklin, Tenn. (10/83) ( 1 p.) A
Feels strongly about maintaining all-male. Hopes that "something as basic to
its character as its all-male undergraduate student body will not be changed."

Reid, Jay H., Jr., '38 BA, Bethesda, MD (1/17/84) ( 1 p. ) P
Brief letter opposes coed in response to a post-holiday note.

Reynolds, D.A., '22 BS, Holiday, Fla. (12/20/83) ( 1 p.) AB
Brief letter opposing coed. "I would not favor W&L being coed."

Root, Robert W., Jr., '70 BS, Silver Spring, MD (12/19/83) ( ½ p.) AB
After reading J. W. Warner's letter, admits "to change of heart." His
"very persuasive case seems very valid at this time." Prefers "to table the
Plan indefinitely."

Rouse, Parke S., Jr., '37 BA, Williamsburg, VA (11/25/83) I 1 p. ) P
Brief letter supporting coed. "What I observe of the educational world persuades
me that it is probably desirable in the interest of long-term enrollment of
high-calibre students."

Rowe, A. Prescott, '60 BA, Richmond, VA (11/83) ( 1 p. ) P
Opposes coeducation. Feels "coeducation would diminish significantly the
uniqueness of W&L." "While change is healthy the overthrow of tradition may
not be so."


-13-

[pb]

Rule, J. Landon, '29 BS, Ponca City, OK ( 1/84) ( ½ p. ) P
Applauds JDW's paper. "Times have changed over the past fifty years."

Ruscio, Kenneth P., '76 BA, PhD, Los Angeles, CA (10/20/83) ( 2½ PP. ) P
Thoughtful support of coed. The loss of quality in students and faculty
remaining single-sex would change the character of the college far more than
admitting women. "While the issue divides us on one level, a decision for coed
would not set us against each other. The bond that unites us is too strong."
Similar letter, 1/6/84, to Bd. of Trustees.

Rutherford, John H., '66 BA, McLean, VA (12/28/83) ( 1 p. ) P
Brief letter. "I think coeducation would not only broaden the base of prospective
students but also enrich the educational process at W&L."

Savage, Thomas Y., '82 JD, Fredericksburg, VA (12/23/83) ( 1 p. ) P
Opposed to coed. Would lose uniqueness. "If W&L were to become coed we
would join the ranks of all other universities across the land."

Schewel, Stanford L., '40 JD, NYC, NY (12/12/83) ( 1 p. ) P
In accord with J. W. Warner's letter of Alumni Bd. Pres. However, "if single
sex causes enrollment to drop, or quality of student to diminish, some drastic
change would be called for." Letter of 1/9 in response to President's reply
to above says "this letter contains many facts of which I was unaware.
Certainly, these facts were not contained in Mr. Warner's letter. In view
of this data - all of which is new to me - I simply would no longer feel
the same way that I did when I wrote my original letter."

Sharp, Mark E., '76 BA, '79 JD, Fairfax, VA (11/3/83) ( 1½ pp.) P
"I sincerely believe it will improve the educational atmosphere to admit women
to the University." Found "nothing particularly magical about our all male
environment" in his seven years here.

Sheild, Conway H., III, '64 BS, '67 JD, Newport News, VA (12/14/83) ( 1 p.) AB
No preference expressed. Has received "input" from local alumni and states that "I
have heard absolutely no comment from any alumni proposing that coeducation
be considered at Washington and Lee."

Sloan, Richard T., '42 BS, Harrisonburg, VA (12/5/83) ( 1 p.) D
Opposes coed. Feels there is too much attention given a problem (demographics)
"that isn't going to last forever."

Smith, Ralph H., '36 BS, JD, Birmingham, AL (1/19/84) ( 1 p. ) P
Has long felt "W&L community suffered from a false and exaggerated sense
of manliness, which has promoted attitudes of heart and mind that frustrates
the pursuit of knowledge and the development of emotional maturity." Feels
entire question demands most careful study.

Sone, Jeffrey M., '78 BS, JD, Dallas, TX (11/14/83) ( 2 pp.) P
Thoughtful letter recognizing the ordeal of change, but convinced that "we
cannot maintain the quality of the student body and remain single sex. Without
a quality student body, we will rapidly lose much of what is special about W&L."


-14-

[pb]

Spence, Jeffrey B., '71 BA, MDiv., Richmond, VA (11/3/83) ( 1 p.) P
Opposes coed wishing to remain unique. "W&L is what it is because of our
uniqueness."

Sparks, James D., '32 JD, Monroe, LA (11/1/83) ( 2 pp.) P
Opposes admission of women. "Am not adverse to admitting girls if it would
affect the existence and continuation of this very old and pretigious school.
Expresses confidence in the Board's best judgment in addressing the matter.
Also, four letters (11/1/83) (11/14) (12/9) (12/20) to Development Office.

Sphar, William R., Jr.'35 BA, Winchester, KY (12/27/83) ( 1 p.) P
Brief letter opposing coed. Notes coed question rises again. "When
coeducation occurs, my contribution ceases,"

Sproul, Archibald A., III, '37 BS, Staunton, VA (11/23/83) ( 1 p.) P
Realizes coed question is complicated. Hopes "we could keep W&L as it is but
am afraid that's impossible. Having served on VMI's Board three years and
knowing the pressures, I am sure it would be difficult not to make it coeducational.

Stackhouse, John W., '55 BS, Atlanta, GA (12/83) ( 1 p.) D
"I have read the various communications about coed. As a traditionalist, I
guess I favor keeping things the way they are, but I can't get too excited
about it either way."

Stone, R.L., '62 BA, '65 JD, Pensacola, FL (12/19/83) ( 1½ p.) BT
Opposed to coed. Feels we would lose unique position in American Society.
Doesn't find in demographic figures that we have suffered any in the last
fifteen years. Wants to maintain traditions, including single-sex.

Strouss, Henry M., III '61 BS, N.Y.C., N.Y. (12/83) ( 1 p. ) P
Opposes coed. "If the school has done nothing up until this date it should
continue as is unless forced to coeducation by federal or state law."

Sutherland, Todd L., '81 BA, Kansas City, Mo (12/83) ( 1 p.) AB
Concurs with J. W. Warner's letter (12/7). The question is "whether coeducation
is a good thing for W&L. It is my belief that it is not."

Suttle, Stephen H., '62 BA, JD, Abilene, TX (1/4/84) ( 1 p. ) P
States no preference. He and his wife "support you in the challenges and
decisions that lie ahead of you with respect to the curriculum and decision
of whether W&L should become co-educational in the future." Confident
"leadership of W&L is in good hands and whatever decision will be made will
be an informed decision."

Taylor, J. Brookins, '50 BA, MD, Bluefield, WVa. (12/14/83) ( 2 sent.) AB
In agreement with J. W. Warner's 12/7 letter. "I am against coeducation at
Washington and Lee University, and I am against eliminating fraternities."

Taylor, Timothy C., '82 BA Austin, TX (11/18/83) ( 1 p.) P
Supports tradition of all-male. "W&L's all male status is essential to and
an integral part of its character, traditions, and identity."

Telford, Robert L., '18-'20, Lexington, KY (12/16/83) ( 1 p. ) BT
Feels the change for coed based on feeling coed will be deterrent to unseemly


-15-

[pb]

misbehavior of excessive drinking and drug use will not be a deterrent.
Feels coed will aggravate the situation.

Thomson, Augustus P., '33 BA, Front Royal, VA (10/4/83) ( 1 p.) P
Vitriolic opposition to coed, the manner, timing, and haste of considering
the issue. Feels the University is being dismembered and destroyed.

Tompkins, Joseph B., Jr., '71 BA, JD, Wash., D.C. (10/24/83) ( 1 p.) P
Expresses no preference. "If the co-education issue is presented in the proper
way to alumni that, whatever the ultimate decision, they will continue to
support W&L as they have in the past."

Tonsmeire, Arthur C., Jr., '34 BA, Mobile, AL (1/13/84) ( 1 p. ) BT
Opposes coed. "There is no reason to make this change. "If it ain't broke,
don't fix it." W&L is a unique institution."

Towill, John B., '29 JD, Augusta, GA (11/23/83) ( 2 pp.) P
Traditionally coed. Sees no reason to change. "We should at least preserve
this aspect of our heritage as a men's school."

Trout, Hugh H., III, '63 BA, MD, Wash., D.C. (11/22/83) ( 1 p.) P
Preferred all-male college as a student, but "given today's environment I might
seek a coeducational institution." The decision concerning co-ed "should be
based on the analysis of whether becoming coed will allow you to recruit an
overall superior student body to the one you are now able to recruit."

Trout, Robert P., '70 BA, JD, Wash., DC (12/29/83) ( 3 pp. ) P
Detailed, cogent support of coeducation. Recognizes tradition of all-male
but feels W&L "should constantly be making changes in an effort to improve
the educational experience." He has "little doubt in my mind that W&L will
one day be coeducational."

Tucker, Everett, Jr., '34 BS, Little Rock, Ark. (11/2/83) ( 1 p.) D
Opposes coed. Had heard of "the flap over going coed, and I surely hope the
Trustees will show the same good judgment in turning it down like they did
when I was president of Alumni Board back in '75." In 1/6/84 letter to Pres.,
"I would like to keep it like it is but I will surely support the considered
verdict you reach."

Walker, Claude M., '41 BS, Columbia, Sc (12/83) ( 1 p. ) BT
In accord with JWW's letter (12/7/83). "His analysis of this proposal leaves
little to add except that I am in complete agreement with his conclusion that
W&L does not need to be or should be a coed school."

Walker, C. Ganahl, Jr., '40 BS, San Antonio, TX (11/17/83) ( 2pp.) P
Opposes coeducation wishing to remain different and unique. "You must be
different or you are just one of the masses." Feels downward demographic
cycle reversing with current increased birthrates.

Walker, Robert C., '34-'37, Columbia, SC (12/23/83) ( 1 p.) AB
Opposed to coed. "Doesn't need women students to improve it in any way,
nor does it need women students to insure its future."


-16-

[pb]

Warner, Jonathan W., '41 BS, Tuscaloosa, Ala. (12/7/83) ( 6 pp.) AB
Penetrating and extensive study of coeducation issues. Mailed to Trustees,
Trustees Emeriti, Alumni Chapter Presidents, selected alumni and friends of
the University.

Weinberg, Manuel M., '31 JD, Frederick, MD (12/12/83) ( 1 p.) P
Expresses agreement with J. W. Warner's ('41) letter to Alum. Bd. Pres. of
12/7/83 and feels most alumni agree. Hopes Warner's recommendations will
be promoted to the Board.

Wellford, Harry W., '46 BA, LLB, Memphis, TN (12/12/83) ( 1 p.) P
Letter is a copy of Wellford's letter to S L Kopald. Feels we have the right
to remain male; coed would already affect nearby women's colleges; hopes
Board will follow traditions and history that has brought us success.

Wetsel, John E., Jr., '70 BA, JD, Winchester, VA (12/1/83) ( 1 p.) P
Supports coeducation. Would not have ten years ago, but need is apparent.
"I have a daughter and I hope she would be afforded the opportunity to attend W&L."

Wilkinson, Maxwell P., '24-'26, Longboat Key, FL (1/84) ( ½ p. ) P
"It's my hope the University will see a bright future without going coed but
I am in no position to say more than this."

Wilson, William L., '27 BA, JD, Cumberland, MD (12/21/83) ( 1 p.) AB
Opposes coeducation. Has received J. W. Warner's 12/7 letter. "Such a drastic
change as is being presently proposed would cause more damage to the institution
than one could comprehend."

Wood, George I., '44 BA, Louisville, KY (11/18/83) ( 1 p.) P
"After studying your twenty pages and doing some alumni soul searching, I am
convinced the financial and educational leadership responsibility for the
future of excellence at W&L indicates we must go coed."

Wurzburger, Stuard A., '28 BA, Lexington, VA (1/16/84) ( 2 pp. ) BT
Opposes coed. Why change? Points to recent W&L Rhodes Scholar. Quotes
USNWR article. Says faculty he's talked to say "give it a try" - but "they
are not business men and do not realize the enormous costs." Quotes figures
on contributions from women law graduates to show how results in alumni-giving
might decline in the future.

Young, M. Neely, II, '66 BA, PhD, Atlanta, GA (10/24/83) ( 2pp.) P
Offers counsel. After a trip here with prospective students this fall,
"it has more than ever confirmed my opinion that coeducation may be ultimately
connected wiht W&L's future as a superior educational institution."





-17-

[pb]

ADDENDA


The following letters were received after January 24, 1984, when the
report was prepared.


Joost, William H., '78 BA, Jacksonville, FL (1/25/84) ( 2 sent.) P
"I exhort you to proceed with the co-education issue with all due speed.
You have my full support."

Paxton, Robert. O., '54 BA, PhD, New York, NY (1/27/84) ( 1 p. ) P
He taught at Columbia 14 years. Columbia's "undergraduate college went
coed last fall after some 280 years. There simply weren't enough young
men around who were rich enough and smart enough to fill our freshman
class, unless we chose to let our academic standards drop." Adds his
voice "to those who think it is time for W&L to adopt coeducation."

Spaulding, George M., '30-'32, Chase City, VA (1/29/84) ( 2 pp. ) D
He and Mrs. Spaulding write jointly. Opposed to coed at present. "We love
the uniqueness of W&L". Feel move would be premature, W&L should be given
a chance "to weather" the population decline. "Do not agree that having
the opposite sex at W&L would enhance the academic atmosphere or improve
the behavior of the students."







-18-