JULY 1980 ty Iversl ington and lee uni fwash i magazine o the alumn ae . Ree i th ene as a fs ae is Sangh The University Library THE LIBRARY DEDICATION Washington and Lee’s new $9-million undergraduate library—called The University Library—was formally dedi- cated in a series of events on Friday and Saturday, May 23- 24. The two-day dedication celebration coincided with the annual spring meeting on campus of the University Board of Trustees, and the trustees were hosts at most of the events, including a reception in the library for the public on Friday evening. The program began with a talk on the role of the modern library in the liberal arts curriculum on Friday morning by Warren J. Haas, president of the Council on Library Re- sources Inc. He spoke in the Mary Moody Northen Audi- torium in the new library. Dr. Edgar F. Shannon Jr., a University trustee, former president of University of Virginia, Commonwealth professor of English at U.Va., and now president of the federated chapters of Phi Beta Kappa, made the principal remarks at the actual dedication on Saturday morning. The ceremony took place on Stemmons Plaza, the newly landscaped walk- way at the main entrance of the library. His talk was followed by lunch on the plaza for all in attendance. Earlier on Saturday, the library faculty and staff were hosts at open-house tours for all guests. A storied, larger-than-life portrait of George Washington was presented to the University on the occasion of the dedication. The important 18th-century painting, executed in Gilbert Stuart's “Lansdowne’ style, is the gift of the David Warner Foundation of Tuscaloosa, Ala. The chairman of the board of the foundation is Jack W. Warner, 40, a Washington and Lee trustee, who with his wife, Elizabeth, is a generous benefactor of the University. The presentation of the portrait took place at a dedication banquet on Friday evening for special guests. University trustees were hosts. The painting hangs in the main lobby of the library. W&L moved into the new library 16 months ago. The library has 130,000 square feet of space—four times the area of the University’s old library, McCormick. The library has shelf space for half a million volumes. Currently, W&L’s undergraduate library collection numbers about 400,000 volumes, although some of those holdings are located in departmental libraries in the natural sciences and in journalism. > The dedication ceremony on Stemmons Plaza in front of the library The new building has study and reading space for 800 users at a time, mostly in the form of carrels—individual desk-and-bookshelf cubicles which students may reserve for an academic term or longer. Most of the 560 carrels are located in the midst of the four stack levels of books, so students working on particular projects can carry out their research and writing in the area where the books they need are shelved. The library also has 31 private studies or offices for upperclass students who are working on honors theses and for faculty. On the main level of the new building are areas for both public and technical services, including the 10,000-volume reference room, a 3-million-card capacity catalogue, and a 1,500-issue capacity periodicals area with seating for 60. W&L currently subscribes to about 1,200 periodicals. On the first lower level are bookstacks for past issues of periodicals; the Northen Auditorium, named for Mrs. Mary Moody Northen of Galveston, Tex., a generous benefactor of W&L and the library building program; and abundant stor- age space for rare books and other special collections, adjoin- ing a clublike Rare Book Reading Room. The library has typing, seminar and conference rooms and several lounges in the bookstack areas for smokers and for non-smokers. The library has the capacity to accept every technological innovation yet known or anticipated, and every carrel could be “hot-wired” for electronic information-retrieval if W&L should wish and be able to afford to do so. Already there are three remote computer terminals link- ed to W&L’s master computer in nearby Tucker Hall. 2 There is also computer service for the library staff, linking W&L with regional and national interlibrary information- sharing networks. Construction on the new library was begun in mid-1976. The architects were Marcellus Wright, Cox & Smith of Richmond, the firm that also designed Lewis Hall, W&L’s four-year-old law building. Bass Construction Co. Inc., also of Richmond, was the general contractor. Although it is a five-story structure, the library was built down into Wood's Creek Valley, and the roofline is only as high as the first floor of Washington Hall. The site, the scale, exterior design, and building materials—red brick with white concrete vertical accents—complement the neo-Classical architecture of the historic Colonnade buildings behind which the library is situated. In a remark in a booklet the University published to mark the library dedication, E. Marshall Nuckols Jr., rector of the W&L board, describes the library as “functionally efficient [and] architecturally distinguished,’and says it has already become the “intellectual second home” of W&L’s professors and student body. W&Ls library resources and services are fully available to students and teachers from other colleges and to residents of the area. The old McCormick Library building, constructed in 1908 and remodeled and enlarged to its limit in 1941, is now being renovated and remodeled once again to become the home of W&L’s School of Commerce, Economics and Poli- tics. That $3.25-million project will be completed this sum- mer, and the new commerce home will be ready for classes in September. ‘through thick and thin to this happy occasion’ Maurice D. Leach Librarian Welcome and an Introduction It is a pleasure to share with you today and tomorrow our joy and satisfaction in this beautiful and efficient building. Thirteen years ago this summer initial planning for the building began, with the President of the University and the faculty and student library committees. Soon afterwards, the Board of Trustees approved the concepts, and the act of writing a building program involving all parts of the Univer- sity community began. From these combined wisdoms our present building has emerged. We are grateful to the Board of Trustees for their total support of our objectives—without stint. A confidence in, and reward for, the library's faculty and staff has sustained us through thick and thin to this happy occasion. To each, we say thank you. Today also marks the beginning of the fourth and final series of events honoring this facility. Two were held in relationship to our fellow librarians, and the third was a conference of 80 deans, professors, and librarians from 15 privately supported colleges in Virginia, exploring the ques- tion of library resources for the college scholar. Within these next two days, we will be privileged to hear from two talented academic leaders and scholars. Our speaker today is Warren J. Haas, who is the president of the Council on Library Resources, and the successor to Dr. Fred C. Cole, W&L’s own distinguished former presi- dent. Jim is a graduate of Wabash College with a degree in history, and he holds a Bachelor of Library Science degree from the University of Wisconsin—a degree which only a few of us were privileged to earn. His professional career has been primarily in academic libraries, notably at Columbia University from 1960 to 1978, except for three years when he was the University of Pennsylvania's librarian. At the time he went to the Council on Library Resources he was Columbia University librarian and vice president for Information Services. Prior to that he served as president of the American Research Libraries, that elect group of aca- demic research libraries. He helped the Ford Foundation establish the Council on Library Resources in 1956, and later at a crucial time in the history of the Library of Congress he served on a task force of librarians to guide it in its study of goals and organization. The impact of the Council on Library Resources upon Maurice D. Leach the development of library technology and research in the United States and abroad is immeasureable. One of the beneficiaries has been this library. Secondly, in its encour- agement of librarians in mid-career, through fellowships and management advancement programs, it has advanced the cause of the profession, and we have had the good fortune of a former member of this faculty, Barbara Brown, being among the first participants. And finally, in its support of international library programs, the United States has pro- vided leadership that has been used throughout the world. The Council has earned a star in the heavens that would be next to Andrew Carnegie among librarians. Jim is on record as saying, “I'm interested in the process of putting information to work . . . and in how libraries can help. Too little thought, for example, has been given to how scholars communicate with the public at large and how society benefits from their activities.” I anticipate his remarks on the role of the modern library in the liberal arts curriculum and its pursuit of excellence. 3 ‘libraries are well into a period of transformation Warren J. Haas Role of the Liberal Arts I have been asked to reflect informally and briefly, not about the building, but about what is likely to go on within it during the years ahead. Specifically, my assigned topic is the role of the modern library in the liberal arts curriculum. I suspect we will also have some observations about the re- sponsibilities that those concerned with the liberal arts have in helping to shape the modern library. In one sense the liberal arts curriculum, the liberal arts themselves,represents the most personal kind of education, and everyone in this room probably has his or her own personal definition of the term. That gives me the right to use my own which is uncomplicated and brief. For me a liberal arts education is one that stimulates the development of three quite different skills. The first is the skill of com- munication in both expression and comprehension. I am talking about here languages and mathematics among other things. Second is the skill of self-instruction, that is, as- sembling and assessing and organizing and synthesizing in- formation pertinent to the matter at hand and using both imagination and intelligence to draw a conclusion from the facts. And finally I guess I would list the skill of appreciation. That is understanding the work and the thought and the influence of other individuals as individuals throughout his- tory. Any library, whether it is a modern one or not, should contribute in some way to the development of these skills. As we all know libraries are well into a period of almost unprecedented transformation. From the point of view of liberal arts colleges, the end product of this transformation should represent improvement when measured against these objectives. If this isn’t the case the transformation will and should be judged a failure. Now what is the nature of this transformation? What is meant by the term a modern library? There are many ardent technologists who would describe that library as a computer terminal linked to an infinite number of data bases. The May 5th Fortune magazine describes this utopia in an article entitled “Everything You Always Wanted to Know May Soon Be On-Line.” I will read you just a few sections of that: “A new industry is growing up around on-line data bases— huge banks of information that are processed, stored and delivered electronically. What the new businesses provide is not so much additional information (most of it has been 4 lying around in printed form for a long time) but a radical improvement in the ease with which information can be retrieved, a promise that the curious can find what they need to know in just a matter of seconds. In a sense, on-line information banks have taken up where Melvil Dewey left off. However great the contribution of his decimal system, he never figured out how to get rid of the leg work, the digging in the stacks, or that researchers nightmare, the key source that is out of date, misplaced or on loan. The new on- line libraries have just about solved those problems. They can drop what you want literally in your lap. Though each of the data banks is limited in scope and usually designed for a specific market the number is proliferating at a dazzling pace. A consulting firm in the field estimates that some 450 of these data banks are now available on-line. In the last three months of 1979 alone 50 data bases were offered in the United States for the first time.” There is a list of the kinds of services and data bases, and I will just read a few to give you some sense of it: “Data on the Japanese economy including a macro-economic model and forecast; geological and production data for every gas and oil well or reservoir in the United States, Canada and on the outer continental shelf; citations and abstracts and new pro- ducts technology markets, etc., for over 2,000 U.S. and foreign publications; complete unabridged articles from the Wall Street Journal, Barron's, Dow Jones, news services, price quotations, etc.; the full text of state and federal court decisions, statutes, regulations and so on. Those are the data bases that are suddenly becoming very, very visible and I would add parenthetically probably profitable. This is enough, I think, to give you some sense of one view of the future. There isn’t time to touch on the many unre- solved questions that are a part of this secenario, for example, copyright issues, the growing trend to assess payment each time information is used. Now you pay a royalty when you buy a book. But there is a growing trend to assess a charge each time information is used. Another area that we don't have time to touch on are the areas of conflict between the entrepreneurs of the information industry and the world of teaching and learning. Another one we dont have time to touch on is the development of new constraints nationally and internationally on the free flow of information. If the author would change his title from “Everything You Always Wanted to Know’ to “Many Things You Wanted to Know,” I would go along with the message. The fact is that computer and communications technology will affect users in libraries in fundamental ways. For our purposes this morning we will talk about and only briefly about two of them. Warren J. Haas First of all is the bibliographic structure on which libraries rest their case really. Historically a library’s bibliographic structure began and ended with a card catalogue. People would come in, look up something, if they found it, they would go get it with luck. Ifit wasn’t there, nine times out of 10, they would sort of pass and go on to something else. But computerized bibliographic systems, such as the OCLC system, which this library makes use of and the research libraries information network, systems such as these are transforming library operations. More important they are transforming the entire process of identifying and locating recorded information. Some day soon the card catalogue which represents the holdings of this library or a specific library will be replaced by bibliographic data bases which will identify all recorded information, wherever it is, on designated subjects and along stipulated perimeters. And second they will locate that information and indicate the means for access to it. Second is the fact of an increasing amount of computerized storage processing and transmission of information. This is perhaps the real essence of the present library revolution. The new computer and communications capabilities will transform and add greatly to the substance of library re- sources and services and will make much more intimate the relationships among libraries and between libraries and the many other enterprises to which libraries are related. Here I am talking about book and journal publishing, the abstracting and indexing services, and the actual sources of information themselves. Much useful information will be available even though it will never appear in print. Other information will be stored in digital form, and it will be printed only when it is needed. Both of these changes will affect liberal education. Ex- panded knowledge about the existence of information will open new opportunities for both teaching and learning. Knowledge of the existence of information which is the purpose of bibliographic systems stimulates demand for that information. This demand will in turn focus attention on improving access to the items themselves. In some ways technology is helping to increase the capabilities of the col- legiate library and to put its users on the same footing as those who have daily access to the largest research collections. The second effect for liberal education is this: larger and larger quantities of certain kinds of information will be avail- able, at a price. By certain kinds of information, I’m referring to what I have begun to see as, what I call, anonymous information—the author has been lost sight of. We are talking about economic data, demographic information, scientific data, documentary material, news reports, full newspapers, patents, information about chemical and biological sub- stances, and a host of similar categories—information that can be abstracted, reorganized, analyzed, compared, and aggregated. Another example: yesterday's mail brought me a publica- tion describing a new service, a new alternative, an interac- tive domestic information system. The print is large so I will read it quickly. “Combining the power of modern information processing and display techniques for the comprehensive data bank of domestic statistics, the Bureau of the Census and NASA have demonstrated at the White House and the Capitol a domestic information system which permits immediate search and analysis of data by interaction between decision makers in the system. The combination of data requested is instantaneously displayed not in tables but in shades of color on a map of the area of interest. Then there is a big, pretty jazzy map there, average unemployment in the first quarter of 1978. The system produces the map and gives you the color chart, giving you the substance of the message. The system permits decision makers to zero in on the answers they need based on the results of previous data requested in analysis. The time to pull data together rather than being a major problem now becomes insignificant. Analysis of com- binations of data is now automatic rather than manual. The whole decision making process doesn't have to be laid out in advance of lengthy computer runs. The results of data re- quests and analysis can be used as the guide for further inquiries. And it goes on and describes how the system uses information in an incredibly large number of subjects and displays it graphically in living color. For example: in a map here a median family income, for instance, green would 3D indicate the highest income while orange indicates the lowest income. This is up and running. Let’s turn back to the skills we attached to our definition of the liberal arts. It is clear that these new library capabilities are important. A new set of skills is required to put computer- stored information to effective use, and the acquisition of those skills is now an essential part of a liberal education. The forthcoming report of the Rockefeller Foundation’s Commission on the Humanities notes that “writing, printing, and computing all represent technological revolutions in disseminating information,” that “all have had profound im- plications for social change” and that, “if intelligently used, the last (that is, computing) may be as beneficial to the humanities as the other two.” The report goes on to say that “for libraries, new technologies provide indispensable means for preserving and storing materials and for increasing access to them. The new technologies take us beyond quantities of information to some of the processes of human intelligence.” No liberal arts college can ignore these facts, and it seems, as a consequence of them, that libraries will, more than ever, have to be an integral part of the educational process rather than an appendage to it. There is one other point I would make here—one con- cerning the relationship between the skills of self-instruction and computer-processed information. Information stored in computers can be easily modified, added to, subtracted from and distorted. Too little attention is being paid to the matter of quality control where computer stored information is concerned. Simply because it’s there and can be read on a cathode-ray tube and manipulated in the processing unit, computer stored information has an aura of respectability about it that even exceeds that of the printed word. It seems essential that every educated person know something about the flow of knowledge and information in each discipline. Without this understanding, any judgment of the validity of information is difficult. We are being inundated with infor- mation of all kinds, and it is essential that the critical sense of students be finely honed as they are being educated. If the presence of the new technologies is one distinctive aspect of what we are calling the modern library, another is a change in perception of collecting objectives. Academic li- braries—whether essentially collegiate libraries or compre- hensive research collections—have an almost pavlovian compulsion for infinite growth traceable to the salivation of librarians and faculty alike at the sound of the bookseller’s bell. I would hastenly add that this passion for books is a virtue and not a vice. But the fact is that the concept of self-sufficiency in libraries has gone the way of self-sufficiency in almost every other aspect of life. The sheer volume of publishing, rising 6 costs, of books and journals, the physical deterioration of books published not long ago, growing storage costs, and many other factors dictate the need for fundamental change in the collection control policies that govern acquisition, retention, preservation, and even the methods of storage of library materials in both print and non-print form. The skills of librarians and faculty members are well tested in the process of building and maintaining a collection of books. Computer data bases will replace published ac- cumulations of information, and if all goes well, the results may be better and even economically sound. But one of the main reasons to store data in a computer is that information so stored can be manipulated, processed, and changed. It is essential that works of creation, of reflection, of observation and of analysis by real, identifiable people not be jeopardized by dumping them into computers and thus paving the way for subsequent consolidation, abstracting, informed and uninformed revision. Two of the greatest hazards of our time are, first, the homogenization and thus over simplification of ideas, and second, the separation of ideas and their authors. Curiously, this very thing is happening in computing. Much remarkably imaginative and even aesthetically hand- some computer software created by brilliant individuals is already lost because of an infinite number of additions, refinements, and modifications by subsequent and usually anonymous technologists. Perhaps the development of com- puter software is destined to be a collective enterprise by the very nature of the beast—but this simply reinforces the place of books, with all their perceived shortcomings as a format that, by its nature, controls tampering with the in- tellectual work of real people. The third liberal arts objective—the skill of appreciation of the work of individuals—comes into play here. Which books should be at hand, to be picked up and read as they are? I'm not talking about books, per se, but about books for what they say. I believe that books should come and go in a collegiate collection. It’s too easy for a collection to become an accumulation. Here, the liberal arts curriculum should determine the content of the collection. Again, librarians must work as colleagues of the faculty to assure that the collections reflect present needs. The underlying nature of a liberal arts education must be kept at the forefront—those objectives we listed must control technology rather than be distorted by it. To turn back to one of the truisms of effective architec- ture—form must follow function. Like the building itself, the form of library service must be constantly assessed against the purposes it is meant to serve. This is as true for the modern library as it is for the old one. ‘we are immensely proud of this new library’ John Newton Thomas Rector Emeritus The Invocation Gracious God, our Heavenly Father, we are met here today in a spirit of gratitude. We are especially grateful on this occasion for Thy gift of human language as an instrument of thought and as a unique mode of its expression. We thank Thee, too, that Thou has enabled man through the centuries to record his thought in language whether on the wall of his cave, on parchment, on the printed page, or on video tape or discs. And thanks to the great literary heritage due to that recording, we lift up profound grateful hearts for this mag- nificent facility, a facility built to house and preserve the fruit of the human mind as it is deposited in recorded language. We thank Thee for its new techniques to make available easily to scholars our literary treasures and to make them inviting to students. We thank Thee, our Heavenly Father, for those who dreamed of this library, for those who dared to undertake its construction, and again with gratitude for those whose understanding and generosity is now making it poss- ible. May those who through the years seek knowledge within these walls be led likewise into truth, and by truth to acknowledge Thee as its ultimate donor and to lead them into the service of their fellowmen as brothers. We now envoke Thy guidance of us in this hour and Thy benediction upon us in the name of Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen. E. Marshall Nuckols Jr. Rector Gratitude and Achievement Dr. Thomas mentioned in his invocation those who dared to go forward with this building, and I would like to point out that it was under his leadership that this was done. He was rector of the board at that time. This is the fourth dedication ceremony in which I have been privileged to participate as your rector. The first, in October 1975, was the very pleasant occasion when we renamed the science building Parmly Hall in memory of Charles Howard Parmly. Then, in 1977, we dedicated the Warner Athletic Center, vastly improving our facilities for sports, recreation, and physical fitness. Three years ago, in May, we dedicated our new law school building, Lewis Hall, Bi Rector E. Marshall Nuckols Jr. at the podium; Rector emeritus John Newton Thomas is at the left. which gave us law teaching facilities which without any question are second to none. The generous benefactors for whom those buildings were named are with us today, Ruth Parmly, Jack Warner, Frances and Sydney Lewis. And on behalf of the entire University family I would like to express to you again our eternal gratitude for your generosity. Without gifts such as these it would not be possible for Washington and Lee to maintain the position of preeminence that it now enjoys. Today we are dedicating the latest addition to our land- mark campus, this new undergraduate library. Iam sure you will all agree that it has to be one of the finest, if not the finest, libraries of its type in the country. I speak for our entire Board of Trustees, a group of very dedicated, loyal lovers of Washington and Lee, when I say we are immensely proud of this new library and of the accomplishments that it represents. We are equally proud to have been a part of the very dynamic developments that have taken place at this Univer- sity and on this campus in the past 10 years—a $62-million development program that has made possible four dedica- tions such as this in the short space of five years, and that is quite an accomplishment. We are proud of the planning, the dedication, and the very hard work that went into bringing about these achievements. Above all, we are proud of the many loyal, devoted and generous alumni and friends who 7 have made these possible. Without them we would not be here today. I would like to remind you that we are not finished. The new home for the School of Commerce, Economics, and Politics is nearing completion and will be occupied next fall. But please do not get the impression that our accomplish- ments have been only in the realm of campus improvements. At the same time that we have been making these im- provements in our physical facilities our outstanding faculty and administration have made very significant strides in ect . * Trustee Sydney Lewis (left) and Trustee Jack W. Warner, for whom buildings at Washington and Lee have been named. Miss Elizabeth Ham represented the long association between Washington and Lee and the late Christopher T. Chenery. 8 improving the academic excellence of this University. Washington and Lee is stronger today, both in the quality of its teaching and the diversity of its curriculum, than ever before in its 230-year history. And there is no question that it ranks very high, very close to the top, in that small group of selective, superior, private universities that remain in this country today. These are indeed great times for Washington and Lee, and your trustees are extremely proud to have been a part of them. Our job now is to keep it that way. a = SOF TPS A a Miss Ruth Parmly, a special guest at the ceremony, was recognized for generosity to Washington and Lee. Mrs. Mary Moody Northen, for whom the library auditorium was named, looks at dedication booklet with graduating senior Craig Cornett. ‘this is a day of fulfillment and of rededication’ President Huntley Credits and a Bit of History For Washington and Lee University, which among so many other things is the embodiment of memories, hopes, and dreams of everyone ever associated with the University, this is a day of fulfillment and of rededication. More than any other building that we have undertaken here in the past 11 years, this building that we dedicate today was built under my immediate surveillance. My office is right there, and everyday from the first ground-breaking I would check the progress and wonder why this, that or the other was going on and marvel at the skills of the workers. This building in particular seemed a long time coming, not the construction itself—which went quite smoothly—but the planning and the fund raising began a long time ago, about a decade. Perhaps it seemed such a long time because this was an important building to the evolution of our entire development program. We had to have the new library before we could provide for the new Commerce School, and we would need Newcomb Hall to accommodate the depart- ments in the College in better fashion. In every sense the library was the key. A great deal of careful planning went into the building under the direction of our librarian, Mr. Maurice Leach, what we call preparing a program for the new facility, articu- lating the ways in which we wanted the library to serve our students and our professors. This program then became the basis for architectual planning and so on until we had a complete set of plans and specifications waiting for the at- tainment of funds that would permit construction. For a time it seemed we would not be able to keep pace with the rising costs of construction. The building seemed to be moving away from us, not closer. Then, in the spring of 1976, the love and dedication that so many attached to Wash- ington and Lee was revealed in several large unrestricted bequests and suddenly the project was within our reach. The Board of Trustees, meeting in a special session in that year, dedicated themselves with renewed vigor to the achieve- ment of all our development goals and gave the go-ahead to the library project, one of the many acts of faith in Washing- ton and Lee’s history. And within weeks thereafter I was embarked on my new career as a second-story superin- tendent. Today, as we look at all that has been achieved, I am filled with a sense of gratitude to those who have made this build- ing and this day possible for this school. The library and its resources are available to every Washington and Lee student and every faculty and staff member and to the community, and I know I speak for the entire University family when I voice the appreciation all of us feel for those who have given so generously to make this a reality. We have undertaken to mention in our dedication publi- cations the names of all those whose support of Washington and Lee was directed specifically to the achievement of this building. I cannot mention them all now, but neither can I fail to mention some of them, so special has been their generosity and their interests. These are our benefactors whose gifts and friendships are recognized by the naming of special areas within the building. We are privileged to have with us today several of these good friends. Mrs. Mary Moody Northen of Galveston, Texas, is well known to many in this audience and in this community as one of the most generous and ardent support- ers of our neighboring Virginia Military Institute, where her beloved father was a cadet and a graduate. We here are especially grateful for the kindness and generosity that she has bestowed upon Washington and Lee, her uncle’s alma mater, and we are proud to be among those who are her friends. Miss Elizabeth Ham is in our audience representing the long heritage of association that has existed between Wash- ington and Lee University and the late Christopher T. Chenery, a member of the Class of 1909, and for many, many years a distinguished member of this University’s Board of Trustees. Miss Ham was Mr. Chenery’s executive secretary and adviser, and when illness removed him from active management of his business it was she who carried on for him and it was she who played a major role in the develop- ment of Mr. Chenery’s Riva Ridge and Secretariat as winners of horse racing’s most coveted trophies. Many of our trustees, both active and emeritus members of the board, have directed their support to this building. Among them are J. Alvin Philpott and James M. Ballengee, both with us here today, as well as Stewart Buxton and John Stemmons, the latter joined in his support by his wife, Ruth, and his late brother, Storey Stemmons and his wife, Grace. I am certain that you are aware that the generous support of all our trustees is recognized elsewhere on this campus. There are others that I want to mention: Miriam Caperton Alexander McClure of New Orleans, whose extraordinary bequest, perhaps more than any other item, assured that this library would be built. Edgar Basse Jr., Ralph Cohen, Wil- liam B. Wisdom, Lila A. Lilly, William C. Norman and his son, Bill Jr., were generous donors. So were W. D. Bain Jr., Robert Glenn Craig, Joseph S. Keelty, Harry McCoy, Stuart 9 Dickson, Robert Mosbacher and Mr. and Mrs. Justin Dart, in memory of James O Brien. The Kresge Foundation, the Burlington Industries Foundation and the Arthur Vining Davis Foundation were important to us as were the A. H. Robins Company. Other individuals recognized in the building were Lillian H. Barclay, Lucille W. Chaffin, William Wells Chaffin, John E. Cole, Charlotte R. Flint, Eben Jackson, Thomas Standifer and Emmett Tardy. The faculty and the staff of the University made contribu- tions to the development program in such dimension that this support became a major source of funds applied to this building and this devotion is recognized there. The library also drew the support ofa secret Washington and Lee society, good friends of the University, recognized in the building. And finally I cannot end this recitation of generosity and friendship without mention of the McCormick family’s earlier support on behalf of the older library which from 1940 until 1979 bore the McCormick name. This is indeed a remarkable building in many ways. For one thing its actual construction was completed ahead of schedule and at a cost to the University substantially under our contractural obligations. The financial advantage to Washington and Lee was so great that perhaps we should honor our principal building architects, both for that fact and for the ingenuity of their design, Mr. Fred Cox and Mr. Ed Smith, who are here with us today, and our principal land- scape architect, Mr. Tom Borellis, who is here as well as the excellent contractor, Mr. Robert Bass, who is among our guests today. . The move from McCormick to the new building was remarkable, truly a community effort involving students, faculty, and townspeople. And I am especially gratified to see so many of those who participated in that move here today, sharing another happy event. The library is distinctive too in the way it is being used. The afternoon of the Great Move, as we have come to call it, students were already staking out study spaces, making it their own, creating, in fact, the ideal which we tried to articulate in the planning. So this is a day of rejoicing in what has been achieved. It is a time for thanking those who have helped us, and it is a time for confronting Washington and Lee’s future with new assurance and new purpose. I am confident of this future. I see in this audience others whose love for Washington and Lee and dedication to its goals are strong: Mr. Ray Loper of the James Graham Brown Foundation, Mr. Bruce King of Continental Financial Services, our good friends. Mr. Nuckols has already alluded to the fact of other dedications of which one is reminded when he looks into the audience at the Lewises, at Miss Parmly, at Jack Warner. 10 Now it is my privilege to introduce the principal speaker on this occasion. We simply could not have made a better choice. To begin with, Edgar Shannon grew up on this campus. He went to college here and for the past six years he has been a trustee of the University. Edgar is very much at home at Washington and Lee. The dedication of a library is, if nothing else, a scholarly event and our speaker is a scholar of the first magnitude. His father was for many years the head of Washington and Lee’s department of English. The achievements of Edgar Shannon’s adult life suggest that the elder Dr. Shannon had no more apt pupil than his own son, whose early discoveries of the adventures of learning set him upon a career of literary and academic distinction. After graduation here in 1939 he received master’s de- grees from Duke and Harvard and earned his Ph.D. degree at Oxford, where he studied as a Rhodes Scholar upon nomination by Washington and Lee. An eminent authority on the life and work of Alfred Lord Tennyson, Dr. Shannon joined the English faculty at the University of Virginia in 1950, and in 1959 Mr. Jefferson’s University paid its older but smaller neighbor beyond the Blue Ridge the compliment of choosing this Washington and Lee man to be president of all the Wahoos. For 15 years he filled that responsibility with unusual distinction and integ- rity, affirming and enlarging upon the University of Virginia's perception as one of the most scholarly of all state univer- sities. In 1974 he stepped aside from the administrative bur- dens of the presidency and returned to the life of the mind and literature as Virginia s Commonwealth Professor of Eng- lish. He is currently the national president of Phi Beta Kappa. With pleasure and with personal pride I introduce this distinguished member of Washington and Lee’s Board of Trustees, Dr. Edgar Finley Shannon Jr. President Huntley ‘generating light in the minds of students and faculty Edgar F. Shannon Jr. Power House of Liberal Learning It is a great pleasure this morning to be able to participate in the dedication of this superb new library. This is the time when we ceremonially recognize the creation of a handsome and functional structure and publicly designate it—conse- crate it if you will—to a specific function in the life of the University. The word “dedication” also has as its root deriva- tion the Latin verb dicere, meaning “to say.” I am indeed honored to be asked to say something on such a significant occasion in the history of Washington and Lee. My father was for many years chairman of the Library Committee, and I grew up almost literally in the shadow of the former Washington and Lee library, living from the age of two until 20 in the Lee-Jackson house, not more than a few steps from what was first Carnegie and then McCormick Library. As a child, before the days of comic books, I used to gorge myself on the Sunday funny papers in the periodical room and thereby became acquainted with most of the lead- ing newspapers in the eastern half of the United States! As a boy, after I had exhausted our family shelves, I read exten- sively during vacations from school, in English and American fiction and drama, which I borrowed from the library. As an undergraduate at W&L, I benefited from its holdings in various fields of the curriculum, especially in philosophy, history, and literature. By returning to Lexington in the summer time, I was able to finish significant parts of my M.A. and Ph.D. theses because of the reference materials in the Washington and Lee library. And as an assistant professor at another institution, I finished several scholarly articles in the same way. My life, you might say, has been a long love affair with this library. I mention these circumstances not merely out of grati- tude—and nostalgia—but to indicate how a library contri- butes to individual development and how it functions for college and community as a cultural resource, as a major impetus for undergraduate learning, and ds an indispensable tool for the research of teacher-scholars. If my personal experience offers such gratifying testimony from the past, how much greater now is the potential that this new building and its collections offer! Let me seize this opportunity, then, as trustee, alumnus, and beneficiary of this library, to express on behalf of the Board and all the University family, deep appreciation to the generous donors who have made possible this fine building and many of its holdings. oY Dr. Edgar F. Shannon Jr. This facility and the present flourishing state of the li- brarys collections and capabilities are the result of the dreams and efforts of many individuals over more than two centuries. The history of the struggles of numerous far- sighted individuals and of the vicissitudes that they sur- mounted in order to bring us to this moment, you will read in Mrs. Betty Kondayan’s excellent historical sketch. I need not rehearse in detail what she has recorded so well, but it is important to remind ourselves briefly of how far the library of Washington and Lee has come from its meager beginnings when, in 1776, the Rector, William Graham, journeyed to Philadelphia and purchased for the sum of £160 “sundry books and apparatus for the use of the Academy.” He selected the first approximately 100 titles wisely, for according to Mrs. Kondayan, writing on the library of Liberty Hall Aca- demy in the Virginia Magazine of History and Biography, “In his choice of books for the library we discover both breadth of outlook and tolerance.” Graham’s purchase of books, as commissioned by Hanover Presbytery of the Pres- byterian Church, was recognition of the fundamental impor- tance of a collection of books to an institution of higher 11 learning. Moreover, the impulse to political freedom, which led the Scotch-Irish conductors of the fledgling Augusta Academy to change its name in 1776 to Liberty Hall Academy, paralleled their establishing a library as a founda- tion for freedom of thought through liberal learning. During the first half of the 19th century, as a result of financial stringency and, in spite of the insistence of suc- cessive librarians upon the need for books, the collection grew only to about 2,000. Compared to 7,500 volumes at Amherst and Dartmouth and the 8,000 which Jefferson had purchased for the opening of the University of Virginia in 1826, Washington and Lee lagged sadly behind. And Hun- ters raid during the Civil War scattered and vandalized many of the books that up to that time had been gradually assembled. It is not surprising, therefore, that in 1866 we should find General Lee, writing in his first annual report to the Board of Trustees, “I need not enlarge upon the importance of a good library to the advancement and prosperity of the college. A useful literary institution cannot be maintained without it, and the first step to acquirement is to provide a suitable building for the preservation and convenient arrangement of the books.” He went on to describe the necessary building and the site for it, but the best he could do was to house the library in the basement of the new chapel that he construct- ed. Not until 1882 was his son, George Washington Park Custis Lee, who succeeded his father as President, able to erect the first library building, Newcomb Hall, constructed for $20,000. The gift of Mrs. Josephine Louise Newcomb, it was plain in appearance (without its present pediment and white columns) and it lacked an adequate heating system. (The stacks were so cold that they paid a man $25 to go in and out of them one hour a day during the four winter months to bring out and to reshelve books. Maybe before long, with the cost of energy we'll have to reinstate that method.) Incorporation of the libraries of the Washington and the Graham-Lee literary-debating societies and some 4,000 volumes of the Franklin Society, Lexington’s intellectual and literary association, along with gifts and bequests, and some major purchases, brought the college library to about 20,000 by 1895. The Carnegie Library, completed in 1908, through a gift from Andrew Carnegie, at that date housed about 45,000 volumes, but before construction began Miss Annie Jo White, renowned as the founder of the Fancy Dress Ball and then the librarian, criticized the architect’s plans as inadequate; and despite her protests, the library in the early 20th century sometimes went several years with no money from the general fund with which to buy books. To the vision of Blanche Pritchard McCrum, who became the University’s first professional librarian in 1918, we owe 12 the modern library of Washington and Lee. As Maurice Leach never tires of saying, she it was who in a prescient paper entitled, “The Potential Role of the Library of Wash- ington and Lee University in the Educational and Literary Development of the South,” in 1936, powerfully set forth the requirements for “the creation of a library good enough to be a genuine stimulus to the intellectual quality of the educational process on the campus.” In her annual report to the President for 1936-37, she even identified the site for a new library building, writing that the “natural . . . [lie] of the land on the hillside toward Wood’s Creek affords an ideal opportunity to build light, airy stacks, in the cubicles of which faculty and students will have ideal working condi- tions —a dream that has now come true. In 1940, under Foster Mohrhardt, who became Librarian after Miss McCrum left for Wellesley, the library finally reached 100,000 volumes, the minimum number for a good college library; and the following year the physical facilities were expanded with a $100,000 gift from the McCormick family into McCormick Library—recognized at the time to be only a temporizing measure, for the educational goals of Washington and Lee could not be achieved without a larger and better-selected collection of books and an entirely new building to shelve them properly and to make them readily available. With the leadership of Presidents Fred Cole and Robert Huntley and with renewed commitment to excellence from the Board of Trustees, as evidenced in Phases I and II of the Development Plan, the library rose from some 180,000 volumes to the current figure of approximately 400,000, more than doubling in two decades through the stewardship of Henry Coleman and especially Maurice Leach. For the latter and his able associates remained the challenge and the excitement of developing the final plans that have reached the happy fruition we commemorate today. To Mr. Leach and his staff, who organized and conducted the physical transfer of thousands of books, to the skillful architects, Mr. Eddie Smith and Mr. Fred Cox of Marcellus Wright and Company, to the able contractors under Mr. Bob Bass of Bass and Co., and to hundreds of members of the University and the community of Lexington, who so expeditiously carried out the move from McCormick, we are deeply grate- ful. As handsome and as commodious as this new facility is, however, I do not have to remind you that this library is more than a building and a lot of books. Like the institution and the people it serves, the library is not a static but a dynamic entity. We cannot assemble today, congratulate ourselves on a new capital improvement to the campus, and go away with the idea that the work of building the library is done. In the words of Tennyson’s Ulysses, the library must “follow knowledge . . . beyond the utmost bound of human thought.” Having arrived at an exciting level of attainment, we must still, in accordance with our motto, be mindful of the future and of the continuing role of the library in fulfilling our cherished commitment to excellence and to the liberal arts. President Huntley is perhaps the most eloquent spokes- man for the liberal arts in our country today, and I wish simply to add my emphatic concurrence with him that they must be the chief component of a sound higher education. “Liberal,” in this context not, of course, to be confounded with political ideology, means liberating or freeing; and the liberal arts are so called because studying them frees the mind from ignorance, from prejudice, and from undisciplined passion. They develop one’s potential for reason and judg- ment. They minister to the inner spirit, and represent a store of common knowledge among educated men and women. They teach us to think and to express our thoughts in speaking and in writing; in other words, to communicate in symbolic language. The program of the library is specifically conceived and designated to fulfill this educational philosophy. To do so means, as the librarian wrote in a recent report to the board of Trustees, a “carefully selected collection of books, pamphlets, periodicals, tapes, recordings, films, and com- puterized information . . . and the services of a professional staff, which, through its bibliographic guidance to the stu- dents and the faculty, is integrated into the teaching and research fiber of the institution. . . .” In addition the college library should increase, he said, “personal enjoyment” and encourage students to satisfy intellectual curiosity by ranging broadly over previously unexplored “seas of thought.” It is easy to see why a library of the highest quality is a sine qua non for maintaining the academic excellence of Washington and Lee. Certainly the library is the authorita- tive source for much of the knowledge available to students and faculty and for the information that must be transmitted in the educational process. And, more and more, the library has come to be regarded, so far as the kind of liberal arts education that we seek to achieve at Washington and Lee is concerned, as the University’s chief or usual place of busi- ness. We generally tend to think of the classroom in such terms, and we cannot dispense with the interchange between faculty and students in classes. But that interchange does not occur without an undergirding of knowledge provided by the library; and fully challenging individual minds to grow depends to a considerable extent upon the library’s sup- planting the textbook and the classroom through under- graduate research and directed independent study. At aconference on American libraries as centers of schol- arship, recently held at Dartmouth, John Sloan Dickey, president emeritus of that institution, characterized the Baker Library as the “heartland of Dartmouth’s enterprise of higher learning’and validated his conception of its place in scholarship and teaching both by the dictionary definition of heartland—a “central and vital area” and the geopolitical one as “an area having ‘strategic advantages for the mastery of the world.’ ” My father, in an introduction to Blanche McCrum’s An Estimate of Standards for a College Library (1933) wrote of the college library as becoming a “treasure house for exploration . . . the educational center of the in- stitution.” Indeed the library is a treasure house for explora- tion by young minds. It provides us with the wisdom of the past, as Matthew Arnold said, “the best which has been thought and said in the world.” Yet because of the so-called explosion of knowledge in our time, the best that has been thought and said in the world is constantly increasing; and like the Red Queen in Alice in Wonderland, the library has to keep running just to stay in place. You will notice that all of the analogies I have mentioned for a library involve the word “center” or “central”; that is, a point around which a circle is described, or a place round which things of like kind or persons with a common object group themselves. Thus the library is at the center of the circle of intellectual unity that Washington and Lee repre- sents as an educational institution. The position of this new library, in the center of the campus, reinforces this central symbolism. Moreover, as many of you will recall, it is built on the site of the old power house, a further metaphor that I have adopted for our library. In these energy conscious times, a power house seems an apt symbol, but instead of being a source of hot water and current, radiating by pipe- lines and cables throughout the campus, the library, as intellectual power house, is generating heat, light, and elec- tricity in the minds of students and faculty. If then, the library is the power house for this institution of liberal learning, and if the quality of education at Wash- ington and Lee depends, as I think it does, upon the quality of the library, we must assure that it continues to produce energy at maximum capacity. With the development of new technologies and with escalating costs, libraries, like the rest of us, face rapid change and many uncertainties about the future. Only a few years ago, I well remember, academic budget-makers used $10 as a rule of thumb for the cost of purchasing and cataloging a book. The figure is more than double that now, and the question arises as to whether the computer will or should supplant the book, just as the book 14 did the manuscript with the invention of the printing press. Without attempting to settle that debate, I think it is fair to say that though the computer is already speeding up the process of retrieving stored knowledge, there is no prospect of dispensing with books any time soon. Many far-reaching decisions will have to be made in the next few years, how- ever, if the Washington and Lee Library is to remain in the forefront of college libraries, and I am not so rash as to try to anticipate them. Instead, I should like to offer several prin- ciples for sustaining our library as the power house for an undergraduate education in the liberal arts—the ideal to which Washington and Lee is committed. First, the primary purpose of the library must be to support the undergraduate curriculum. The library does so by authoritative and up-to-date reference and bibliographical resources, so that users not only may have access to extensive and accurate information but may know about material held in other libraries besides this one. Presently the library staff, faculty, and students are interacting effectively through de- partmental courses in bibliographic resources and methods taught jointly by librarians and members of the faculty in a number of subject areas in the social sciences and humani- ties. I trust that this instruction in how to make the most complete use of the educational opportunities that the library affords will expand to all departments and include increasing numbers of students. Further, the library supports the cur- riculum by regular annual purchases of selected books in the subjects in which Washington and Lee offers instruction, so as to provide the latest thinking in each field combined with breadth or perspective and accuracy of scholarship. A wide range of current periodicals is also necessary, if faculty and students are to keep abreast in their areas of study. Active and systematic participation in the process of selecting books, periodicals, and other materials by library staff and faculty, as well as by students engaged in research, is the only way to guarantee that the library remains pertinent to the curric- ulum. Washington and Lee justifiably prides itself on being a teaching institution, and what we teach must be on the leading edge of knowledge. To be specific, Washington and Lee purchases between 5,000 and 6,000 books a year and catalogues approximately 10,000, as a result of gifts and deposits of government docu- ments, for example. We subscribe to nearly 1,300 periodi- cals. These figures are approximately what we must expect for some time to come; and, of course, books wear out and have to be rebound or replaced, and the holdings have to be culled to keep the library as a current working collection. At the moment expenditures for the operation of the library, including staff salaries, total over halfa million dollars a year, and that amount, like all educational costs, is certain to rise. My second principle is this: the library must continue to augment its capacity to aid research by faculty and students. The Washington and Lee library cannot and should not undertake to be a major research library in the sense of being a great national repository, such as the Library of Congress or the New York Public Library, or a library of a major university offering extensive graduate work for the Ph.D. degree. But the college library must have the quality and the capabilities to assist and to encourage the faculty in pursuing specialized studies in their field and in refreshing them- selves with constant learning. This objective will be accom- plished in part through expanded inter-library loans from research libraries, through the purchase of limited amounts of pertinent material for research in progress, and through bibliographical and technological aids such as microfilm, microfiche, and no doubt, “on-line machine readable” in- formation through computer terminals. At the same time, the library of the future will be used increasingly by students pursuing research for course papers and projects requiring individual study beyond the classroom—a development fully consonant with Washington and Lee’s institutional philoso- phy concerning the importance of the individual and his sense of personal responsibility. Undergraduate research contributes to resourcefulness and self-reliance, to the ability for taking the initiative in one’s own learning, and to incul- cating qualities of leadership. John Gardner, former head of the Carnegie Corporation and former Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, has complained that American education is over-specialized and that no one really wants to educate the leader. Everyone is prepared, he says, to educate the specialist who advises the leader but not the leader himself. Leaders in government and executives in business deal not primarily with technical details but almost exclusively with ideas and with people. Broad comprehension, the ability to think, to evaluate and to make judgments, to express oneself, to communicate one’s concepts, and to motivate others to carry them out, are marks of the leader, and this is just the kind of person that our library-powered liberal arts education here at Washing- ton and Lee seeks to produce. A third principle must be for the library to stay abreast of the latest developments in technology. As many of you know, we are already benefiting greatly from participation in SOLINET, the Southeastern Library Network, a computer system that connects us with the Ohio College Library Cen- ter, serving all the major college and university libraries in the southeastern part of the United States. This electronic link has been of untold value in the reclassification of our entire collection according to the Library of Congress sys- tem, in invoicing and record-keeping, and in interlibrary BOOKLETS AVAILABLE The University published a handsome pair of booklets on the occasion of the dedication of the new library—one a 44-page description, lavishly illustrated (with several full-color photographs), of the philosophy and function of the new building, the other a 16-page program of dedication events. Alumni, parents and friends are invited to write to the Office of University Development (Washington and Lee, Lexington 24450) for complimentary University Library information packets. loans. In addition, consideration will have to be given to acquiring the hardware and software, already commercially available, for computerized retrieval of bibliographical and other information. Although with miniturization computers are becoming smaller and less expensive, they are still costly and the extent of the demand and the convenience of our users will have to be balanced against those costs. We shall no doubt need to make further use of microfilm and micro- fiche—those tools of modern photographic technology that make available extensive sources of information, especially files of newspapers, in compact form requiring a limited amount of storage space. Fourth, we must be alert to co-operate with other li- braries, especially in the state of Virginia, to establish net- works in which each library covers certain subjects and has certain capabilities to contribute to the total enterprise. This and other kinds of cooperation can avoid duplication, hold down costs, and carry out inter-library loans in ways that will reduce the burden on the major research libraries, such as the University of Virginia, VPI-SU, and the State Library in Richmond, and at the same time make information and educational materials readily accessible to the various cam- puses and communities. Finally, we must not forget the importance of the library as a cultural center for Washington and Lee and Lexington. In addition to books for general reading, the library will augment its cultural role by sponsoring speakers, readings by authors, conferences such as the stimulating one entitled “Library Resources for College Scholars” held here on the campus in February, and by publications concerning the holdings and activities of the library. All the stimulating activity—academic and cultural—to which I have alluded will occur only if the library is appropri- ately staffed with highly qualified, energetic professionals, who have the vision and the educational background to maintain and enhance the library's position as the genuine power house of this University. Today, then, we come to this place not merely to dedicate a building and to express our joy over a consummation for which we have long devoutly wished. We come to engage the future and to rededicate ourselves to the conception of the library as the dynamic source of power, energizing the life of the mind at Washington and Lee. While we celebrate a dream come true, we come as well to recommit ourselves to sustaining that dream as a continuing reality. If the future of many liberal arts colleges may be in doubt, there can be no doubt about the future of Washington and Lee and about its prospects for further contributions to education and to society, so long as we regard the library as the power house of our liberal learning. 15 by Robert S. Keefe Washington by Winstanley University Receives an Important 1796 Portrait Via Calcutta An important 18th-century portrait of George Washington, larger than life with a romantic history just as big, has been given to the University by the David Warner Foundation of Tuscaloosa, Ala. The superb portrait, which is in Gilbert Stuart's “Lansdowne” style, was presented to W&L on the occasion of the dedication of the new library in May. The painting— attributed to the artist William Winstanley, a contemporary and colleague of Stuart—hangs in the main lobby of the library. The chairman of the board of the David Warner Foundation is Jack W. Warner, 40, a member of W&L’s Board of Trustees since 1970 and, with his wife, Elizabeth, one of Washington and Lee’s most generous supporters for many years in terms of gifts, time, and energy. The new Warner Athletic Center is named for him. Mr. Warner is president and board chairman of Gulf States Paper Corp. of Tuscaloosa. The portrait, painted about 1796, toward the end of Washington’s life, spent 163 years not in America but in India. It had been given in 1801 as a mark of “esteem and affection” to a self-made Hindu multimillionaire, Ramdoolal Dey, by a group of influential American ship captains and merchants whom Ramdoolal had befriended and supported during the very first years of America’s international trade following independence. Ramdoolal was born literally in a field in 1752, the son of desperately poor beggar parents. He was a Horatio Alger of sorts, however, and worked his way up in the commercial empire of one of Calcutta’s leading exporters, acquiring a vast fortune at an early age—and a reputation for scrupulous honesty. When the brand-new United States commenced its foreign trade in 1783, he began immediately to supply his American friends with loans of money and with quality goods that were anxiously sought- after in the young republic—leading to his friends’ considerable prosperity and adding further to his own. His friends whom he had helped to wealth decided to present him with a uniquely American gift in thanks, and could think of nothing more fitting than 16 J ack W. Warner the then-five-year-old Washington portrait by Winstanley which has now been given to W&L by the Warner Foundation. The painting was eventually sold to another Indian by Ramdoolal’s grandson, and it remained in Calcutta until 1963, when it was purchased by a Czech-born American, Erick Kauders of Marblehead, Mass. The Warner Foundation purchased it this spring specifically for Washington and Lee. The portrait joins two other important early works of George Washington art in W&L's collections that are of exceptional value—Charles Willson Peale’s priceless 1772 portrait of Washington in the uniform of a colonel in the Virginia militia, the first painting ever made of Washington from life, and an original Gilbert Stuart portrait in his famed Athanaeum style. In a brief article published on the occasion of the donation of the Winstanley portrait, W&L's Dr. Pamela Simpson, associate professor of art history, said the new portrait is “perhaps less faithful to Washington the man” than either of the other two famous representations in the W&L collection, the Stuart Athanaeum painting and the Peale portrait. “Instead,” Dr. Simpson writes, “it depicts him as his countrymen idealized him, even while he was alive. It is a portrait of a réle. . . . It is as a moral ideal that we see Washington portrayed in this Lansdowne copy . . . [which] thus adds measurably to the historical importance of [W&L’s] collections and to the historical and aesthetic values they reflect.” It was George Washington who in 1796 rescued the school then called Liberty Hall Academy from the literal brink of bankruptcy by endowing it with $50,000 in stock, at the time the largest act of philanthropy in the nation’s history. At the library-dedication banquet when the gift of the portrait was announced, Jack Warner described his philosophy of selecting works of art for purchase. “If I like it, I buy it,” he said. “Tf I don't, I don’t.” The biographical information about Ramdoolal Dey, and the story of the painting's Calcutta years, are derived from an article by Dr. Duncan Emrich of American University, Washington, D.C., “A Yankee Gift to a Bengali,” in Smith- sonian magazine, February, 1976. Below—The Ramdoolal Dey portrait (closeup, top left) hangs majestically in the main lobby of the new library (top right). On the night it was formally presented to the University, Board Secretary James W. Whitehead presented a dramatic mixed-media program (bottom photos) tracing WéL’s George Washington art across two centuries, from the Peale portrait, the first ever painted of Washington from life, through Mathew Kahle’s folk-art classic Ol George (center), to the newly acquired Ramdoolal portrait by Winstanley (right). Commencement 1980 Four Alumni Are Honored as 319 Undergraduates Are Awarded Diplomas Washington and Lee awarded diplomas to 319 undergraduate seniors and conferred four honorary doctorates in commencement excerises on June 5, marking the end of its 230th academic year. The honorary degrees were all presented to prominent alumni: Dr. E. Lovell Becker, a kidney specialist who was the American Medical Association’s director of graduate medical evaluation for the past two years and who will become director of medicine at Beth Israel Medical Center in New York in September, and is now professor of medicine at Mount Sinai School of Medicine; Edward M. Korry of Stonington, Conn., former United States ambassador to Ethiopia and Chile and prize-winning newsman, now a writer and consultant; Rupert N. Latture of Lexington, the 88-year-old surviving founder of Omicron Delta Kappa, the campus leadership society he and 14 Washington and Lee friends founded in 1914, which now has chapters on more than 160 campuses throughout the nation; And Edwin A. Morris of Greensboro, N.C., board chairman of Blue Bell Inc., the manufacturer of Wrangler jeans, whose company sales have tripled in just the past five years. ) Commencement-week activities began with the traditional baccalaureate sermon, delivered this year by Dr. David W. Sprunt, University chaplin and Fletcher Otey Thomas Professor of Bible. His address was followed by the Alumni Association's traditional luncheon on the Front Lawn for graduates and their guests. In the graduating class, nine students received summa cum laude honors for academic excellence; magna cum laude and cum laude distinctions went to 36 and 79 seniors, respectively. The undergraduate commencement excercises began with a commissioning ceremony for 20 graduates of the Reserve Officers Training Corps program. Lt. Gen. Robert G. Gard Jr., president of the National Defense University, was the speaker. In his remarks to the B.A. and B.S. 18 Rupert N. Latture graduates and their families, President Huntley warned that “a college degree is not primarily a credential that will serve as a key to open locked doors. From here on out, less will be given to you and more will be expected of you. At the very least, it will be expected that you live your lives in Edwin A. Morris a way that leaves things no worse than they were before you came along. Such an objective, incidentally, though somewhat negatively framed, is not an altogether unworthy one... .” Huntley also noted that “it is popular in these days in certain contexts to refer to ‘value judgments ; the phrase is redundant. All judgments are value judgments, or they are not judgments at all. “We are told that, in his last years, Lee was once asked by the mother of a small infant what bit of wisdom she could pass on to him. Lee replied, after some thought: “Tell him to deny himself.’ “Of course, I do not know what Lee meant by that—but I should like to think he spoke from the depths of his own tortured bouts with himself, and the wisdom and equanimity he had painfully acquired. I should like to think he meant: ‘Tell him to deny self-pity, to control self- concern, to subdue self-love. Tell him to direct those instincts for pity and concern and love outward, where they nourish others, rather than inward where they will starve his soul.’ “T think it may be accurate to say that the whole purpose of liberal education is to allow one to increase the scope of power over one's self, the power of self-direction and the ability to perceive more sensitively the worth and value of one’s actions. Education is liberal precisely insofar as it extends one’s freedom in this way. The Algernon Sydney Sullivan Medallion, conferred by the faculty on the student who has most conspicuously excelled “in high ideals of living, in spiritual qualities, and in generous and disinterested service to others,” was presented to Jay Judah Blumberg of Boonton, N.J., senior class representative on the student Executive Committee and founding chairman of W&L’s muscular dystrophy dance marathon in 1979. In his two years as chairman of the charity event, approximately $35,000 was raised toward MD treatment and research. William Henry Matthai Jr. of Baltimore was the 1980 valedictorian. He graduated summa cum laude with a B.S. degree in chemistry, and compiled an almost-perfect academic record during his four years—a 3.944 grade-point average on W&L’s 4.0 scale. Another highlight of the graduation exercises was the presentation of the first annual Jean Amory Wornom Award for : fee, 4 fi Wi pc ee Wi lliam H. Matthai Jr., 1980 class valedictorian, is congratulated by his parents and President Huntley in the president's office prior to the commencement exercises. President Huntley extends a warm handshake to Algernon Sydney Sullivan Medallion winner Jay J. Blumberg, pictured here with his parents. Distinguished Literary Criticism, given for the best piece of discursive writing in an English course during the academic year. The 1980 recipient—who received his award from I. Leake Wornom Jr., 50L, and family—was James R. Leva, a senior English major, who also won a Mahan Award for outstanding creative writing this year as well as a Fulbright Scholarship for study in France next year. Dr. Becker, who received the honorary Doctor of Science degree, is a 1944 W&L graduate. In addition to his current medical duties, he has served as president of the National Kidney Foundation from 1970 to 1973, and was director of continuing education for Cornell's medical school from 1972 until 1978 when he went to the A.M.A. in Chicago. The honorary degree citation for Dr. Becker remarked that his busy career hasn't hampered his interest in other fields. An active explorer—to such remote areas as Antarctica, Alaska’s glacier lands, the Amazon River—and an expert photographer, he is also a gourmet cook and is currently writing a book on fortified wines. The citation concluded, “We would like to think that the breadth of knowledge and interests he has exhibited over the years is due in part to his exposure to the liberal arts tradition here at Washington and Lee.” Korry, an alumnus of the class of 1942, 19 Commencement 1980 was a journalist for 20 years before he was pressed into diplomatic service by President Kennedy. Working for UP Radio, he became chief correspondent in post-War Germany and later chief European correspondent. In 1958 he became European editor of Look, and won two of journalism’s most prestigious honors—the Overseas Press Club Award for magazine reporting and the American Newspaper Guild’s Page One Award. In recent years, since his return to private life, he has been president of the Association of American Publishers and president of the United Nations Association; he was a consultant to the State Department; and is a visiting lecturer in government at Connecticut College. He received the honorary Doctor of Laws degree. “Rupert Latture and Washington and Lee have been part of each other for so long surely no one here today was witness to the beginning of this remarkable association.” So began the citation reading for the man whose professional career at Washington and Lee has reached a record- breaking length of 60 years—dating back to 1920, when he returned to W&L after World War I to teach political science, moving through his later 21 years as department head, then the most recent 18 years spent as special assistant to the president. And no end in sight. The citation continues: “When es . ‘ eS Th ‘ % 3 tit? = hea S| S ead : ; us . at I. Leake Wornom, ’50L (second from left), presents the first annual Jean Amory Wornom Award for freshmen and families arrive in September, he is there at the freshman dorm to make them feel welcome. When alumni return to campus, his is the familiar face to every student generation, and the reunions are warm and nostalgic. He carries on a lively correspondence with dozens of older alumni, maintaining and cultivating a level of interest among them that no other person at Washington and Lee could do as well. He has indeed moved this University, all for the better, evoking in us sentiments of admiration, pride and great respect. Of all the honorary degrees ever conferred by Washington and Lee University, none has ever been awarded with the special gratitude and affection that accompanies this proclamation of Rupert Nelson Latture as Doctor of Laws.” At the close of this citation, one and all rose to their feet in a happy, sustained ovation. Morris received his degree in business administration from Washington and Lee in 1926, and later earned a master’s degree from Harvard Business School. He (through his Blue Bell company) has, in the words of his citation, “done as much as any man to ease the lives of college students everywhere. He makes blue jeans. Indeed, he has applied this principle of quality at a low price to his more than 40 years of leadership at Blue Bell—famous, among other things, for its Wrangler jeans—and in the process he has el Distinguished Critical Writing to James R. Leva,’80. Also pictured are (from left) Isaac L. Wornom III, ‘77; John M. Evans, chairman of the awards committee; I. Leake Wornom; Mrs. Bessie S. Amory, mother of the late Jean Amory Wornom; and Thomas A. Wornom, ’80. 20 built an international, billion-dollar-a-year business.” He is currently a member of the executive committee of Duke University’s hospital advisory board and a trustee of the American Institute for Economic Research. Duke’s clinical cancer-research building was dedicated in his name in 1978. And in addition, he was an organizer and chairman of Washington and Lee’s Estate Planning Council and continues to be an adviser to it. He received the honorary Doctor of Laws degree. ARERR SSR gee a OR Baccalaureate Three models ranging in time and culture from St. Paul to Robert E. Lee to the Japanese ideal of “shibumi’ can provide important keys to achievement of self-discipline, the chaplain of Washington and Lee University told graduating students and their families in his baccalaureate sermon. Dr. David Worth Sprunt, W&L’s Fletcher Otey Thomas Professor of Bible and department head as well as chaplain, described the search for self- mastery as perhaps the most troublesome challenge facing college students, not to mention anyone else who hopes to function adequately in contemporary society. Sprunt recalled that several years ago, a dozen or more W&L undergraduates organized an informal discussion group with his help to address some of the problems they faced as students, particularly the question of achieving self- mastery or self-discipline. Outsiders seem to have re-interpreted that original question, Sprunt said, to the point that in a recent book, The Trouble With Nowadays, author Cleveland Amory asserts that those W&L students were alarmed over a complete inability “to do anything from completing an assignment to writing a decent paper. ” That was never the case, Sprunt said in his baccalaureate remarks. He termed Amory s indictment—attributed in the book to Sprunt himself—“‘ridiculous” and “silly.” But the question of self-discipline, if it Alumni fathers of law graduates stand behind Fe Dr. David Worth Sprunt is distinguished from paralyzing incapacity to function—remains, the chaplain said. The oddly disparate clues to the attitude necessary for achieving self- discipline, he said, begin with a “strikingly relevant’ passage from Paul’s letter written from prison to the Philippians. “I have learned,” the apostle wrote, “to find resources in myself whatever my circumstances. I know what it is to be brought low, and I know what it is to have plenty. . . . I have strength for anything through Him who gives me power.” In Lee, discipline made itself apparent in his unfailing commitment to be “calm when others were frenzied, loving when they hated, and silent when they spoke with bitter tongue.” Sprunt quoted Douglas Southall Freeman’s characterization of Lee as “sustained in all of it by the self-mastery that was, in large measure, the expression of his religion. Belief in God’s mercy and submission to His will . . . were stronger after Appomattox, if that were possible, than before. ” And in the new book by Trevanian, their daughters and son (left to right) Ga Richard H. Turley, ’45, Elizabeth Turley; @® J. Vaughan Beale, ’36, ’39L, Jesse B. Beale; Gaya Jack S. Callicott, ’49, Betsey Callicott. SiM@s Shibumi, Sprunt found the concept at the basis of the Japanese ideal of simplicity. In an effort to define the elusive title concept, one of the book’s main characters wonders if it may refer to “authority without domination . . . one must pass through knowledge and arrive at simplicity.” The turn of phrase is almost verbatim from Lee’s own writings and descriptions of him by biographers. If that character in the book had known Lee, Sprunt said, “I imagine he would have quickly recognized that very quality he himself sought in the character of Lee—that wholly human gentleman, the essential elements of whose positive character were two and only two, simplicity and spirituality.” SSR TREE eA eR ZA Law Commencement Washington and Lee awarded law degrees to 103 men and women on Sunday, May 25. President Huntley, in his commencement address, cautioned the graduates to be conscious of the urgent need to strike a balance between the extremes of viewing the system of laws as a machine, on the one hand, and giving in wholly to emotion and instinct, on the other hand. The ceremony was held in Lee Chapel instead of on the Front Lawn because of intermittent showers throughout the day. President Huntley told the graduates and the standing-room-only audience of families and friends: “The most important thing lawyers do is think. Lawyers are paid to think because they seem to be better at thinking than most others are. They are expected to be able to think effectively about almost any subject—and not just about purely legal matters, if indeed there are any purely legal matters. . . . “The very best lawyer,” he said, “is one who lives the life of the mind in a practical world—a life of reason.” He noted the 19th century Scottish philosopher Thomas Carlyle’s attack on Mechanism: “ ‘All is by rule and calculated contrivance, ” and literature, religion, the arts, and even government become corrupted by a neglect of the “ ‘moral, religious, and spiritual condition of people.’ ” Huntley warned the new lawyers that “the kind of Mechanistic thinking Carlyle attacks is one of the gravest risks to be encountered in the process of ‘thinking like a lawyer.’ ” But, Huntley said, the other extreme— “to replace [Mechanism] with a reverence for emotion and instinct”—is likely to lead to just as severe a deterioration of the fabric of society. The “cults” that proliferated in recent years “provide adequate examples,” he said, of excess in “reaction against the intellect, reaction against the life of reason.” Huntley told the graduates their challenge must be “to continue to sharpen those disciplines of thought to which your legal education has at least introduced you. .. . It is perilously dangerous—and dehumanizing—to allow the intellect to avoid confrontation with the profound values that give meaning to life. “Tf there is no reason, no possibility of truth, no justice, then law is reduced to an absurd effort, ‘full,’ in Macbeth’s phrase, ‘of sound and fury, signifying nothing.’ ” President Huntley addresses law graduates in a crowded Lee Chapel. 21 i *é a ‘ Sons of alumni who received academic degrees standing behind their fathers: John R. Cole, 50, and John R. Cole Jr.; Everett W. Newcomb Jr., ’45, and Robert S: Newcomb; Herbert N. Hamric Jr., 46, and Mark A. Hamric; Isaac Leake Wornom Jr., ’50L, and Thomas A. Wornom; George D. Vermilya, 30, and George D. Vermilya Jr.; Matthew W. Paxton Jr., 49, and William W. Paxton; David E. Constine Jr., 52, and David E. Constine III; Arthur W. Mann Jr., ’40, and Thomas F.. Mann; John S. R. Schoenfeld, ’49, and Richard H. Schoenfeld; Ernest L. Childs Jr.,’36, and Dale S. Childs; Tom Moore Jr., 45, and H. Frederick T. Moore; A. Lea Booth, ’40, and sons Cary G. Booth and George L. Booth. Ps * 237 ° es r 3 > a ee = : vo? i a at ba t ?wt~* (tax and service charge included) . eo..." * Exciting one-day cruise to the islands of Aegina, Poros and Hydra, lunch included Exciting low-cost optional tours available All gratuities for bellmen and doormen United States departure tax ($3.00) included*** All round trip transfers via deluxe motorcoach with Greek hosts, and luggage handling from airport to hotel Welcome orientation meeting upon arrival in Greece A FREE Visitor's Guidebook to Greece; informative reading to answer your many questions Plus 15% tax & service charge Plus $117.10 fuel surcharget Per person-double occupancy Single supplement - $150.00 Norfolk Departure waits $729. Plus 15% tax & service charge Plus $117.10 fuel surcharget Per + + + > a person-double occupancy Single supplement - $150.00 » a TThis price includes fuel increases through May, 1980. An adjustment for additional increase may be made prior to departure. 7 _ %* Free time to pursue your own interests; no regimentation ee eee ee : * Experienced tour director and hotel hospitality desk, staffed “**Foreign arrival/departure tax(es) not included : by an on-site team of pr Ofessionals For further information and reservation coupon, contact: W.C. Washburn, Washington and Lee University Alumni, Inc., Lexington, Virginia 24450 PHONE: (703) 463-9111 ext. 214 WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY ALUMNI, INC. 02330 GREECE: October 2-10, 1980 Name City _ ee Address Phone a the alumni magazine of washington and lee (USPS 667-040) Volume 55, Number 5, July 1980 William C. Washburn, 40 .................... oblast apees Editor Romulus T. Weatherman .................65- Managing Editor Robert S. Keefe, 68 ...........c..ccc cc eec eee, Associate Editor M. Gray Coleman, 79 .............eseeeee eens Assistant Editor P. Craig Cornett, 80 ..............ceeeeeeee wees Assistant Editor Joyce Carter .........cccce cee ec eee ee ene ee en ees Editorial Assistant Sally Mann ..........e cece ec cece neneeeee nena ee enenes Photographer TABLE OF CONTENTS Library Dedication ..............ccceceee cece seen ee eeeees 1 Welcome and Introduction ................000eeeee 3 Library and the Liberal Arts ...................006. 4 The Rector’s Remarks ..............ccceceeeeeeeeeees 1 The President’s Remarks ................00cceeeeeee 9 The Power House of Learning .................665. 11 Gift of a Portrait 2.0.0.0... cc cccc ccc ccc cece eee eeeeeeaeeees 16 Commencement, 1980 ..............00eeeeeeeee eens eee ees 18 Sons of Alumni ............ 0. cece cece eee e eee e enact ene ee ees 22 Order of Ramdoolal Dey .................ceceeeee enone 23 WL Gazette .ooc ccc ccccccce eee c cece eee e cece cece eee e eee eees 2A Spring Sports Roundup ...............ceceeeeeeeeeee eee 28 Chapter NeWS ..........:cceceeeeneeee ee ee ee eeeeneeeenenees 30 Class Notes .........cccccccccesccsceceeceeseeeeeeseeeeeees 32 In Memoriam ........... ccc cece cece cece eee e eset eeeene eens 39 Published in January, March, April, May, July, September, Octo- ber, and November by Washington and Lee University Alumni, Inc., Lexington, Virginia 24450. All communications and POD Forms 3579 should be sent to Washington and Lee Alumni, Inc., Lexington, Va. 24450. Second class postage paid at Lexington, Va. 24450 and additional mailing offices. Officers and Directors Washington and Lee Alumni, Inc. RICHARD A. DENNY JR., 52, Atlanta, Ga. President WILLIAM B. OGILVIE, 64, Houston, Texas Vice President PAUL E. SANDERS, 43, White Plains, N.Y. Treasurer WILLIAM C. WASHBURN, 40, Lexington, Va. Secretary LEROY C. ATKINS, 68, Lexington, Va. Assistant Secretary PETER A. AGELASTO III, 62, Norfolk, Va. W. DONALD Bain, 49, Spartanburg, S.C. ANDREW N. Baur, 66, St. Louis, Mo. EDGAR M. Boyp, 42, Baltimore, Md. JAMES F. GALLIVAN, 51, Nashville, Tenn. OweEN H. HARPER, 59, Pasadena, Calif. G. RUSSELL Lapp, 57, Mobile, Ala. WILLIAM E. LATTURE, 49, Greensboro, N.C. JoHN H. McCorMackx Jr., 50, Jacksonville, Fla. WILLIAM C. NORMAN JR., 56, Crossett, Ark. obs 7 ON THE COVER: A Presidential-size 18th-century portrait of George Washington, attributed to William Winstanley (after the style of Gilbert Stuart), was given to the University by the David Warner Foundation of Tuscaloosa on the occasion of the dedication of the new University Library in May. For the romantic historical saga of the portrait, turn to page 16. Coverage of the library dedication itself begins on page 1.