An Illogical Policy Protecting the Dignity of Undocumented Immigrants with Chronic Illness

Abstract

This paper assesses the implications of imprecision in federal legislation concerning emergency medical treatment of undocumented immigrants and the obligation of the U.S. to facilitate extended treatment of illegal immigrants in the U.S. . . . This paper begins with an overview of current U.S. regulation on undocumented immigrants' access to long-term care. Then, I explore the standard set forth in Greenery v. Hammon and its impact on three other court decisions. Ultimately, this paper argues for a change in policy that no longer focuses on emergency room care, but also recognizes the consequences of denying Medicaid coverage to those undocumented immigrants who are chronically ill. The main justifications for this argument are the moral significance of health and the justice that health protects. [From introductory section]