Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseIn Copyrighten_US
dc.creatorKyle, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-10T15:35:58Z
dc.date.available2013-12-10T15:35:58Z
dc.date.created2008
dc.identifierWLURG38_Kyle_POV_2008_wm
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11021/24211
dc.descriptionPeter Kyle is a member of the Class of 2009 of Washington and Lee University.en_US
dc.descriptionCapstone; [FULL-TEXT FREELY AVAILABLE ONLINE]en_US
dc.description.abstractIn 1999 an estimated $1.2 billion was spent to provide indigent criminal defense in the nation's 100 most populous counties. This $1.2 billion represents an estimated 3% of all local criminal justice expenditures in these counties. Clearly, on a national level, a lack of parity persists between the value placed on indigent defense and the value placed on maintaining a high conviction rate and ensuring criminals are placed in jail through vigorous prosecution. Levels of parity, however, vary from state to state, as indigent defense in non-federal cases is funded solely by states or localities . . . Therefore, one must analyze indigent defense on a state specific basis. This methodology can prove beneficial rather than constraining, because one can compare states and perceive effective and ineffective strategies for defending the indigent—in essence, states can learn from both the successes and failures of one another. In this study, other states will be used to illuminate the juxtaposition of the current state of indigent defense in Virginia with the ostensible values and goals she professes. Although Virginia has made noteworthy progress in the past few years, she still falls markedly short of the standards she sets for herself. Through a better conceptual understanding of progress made in Virginia and the nature of the barriers to progress, one can recognize the direction in which Virginia must now head. [From Introduction]en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityPeter Kyle
dc.format.extent45 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsThis material is made available for use in research, teaching, and private study, pursuant to U.S. Copyright law. The user assumes full responsibility for any use of the materials, including but not limited to, infringement of copyright and publication rights of reproduced materials. Any materials used should be fully credited with the source.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.subject.otherWashington and Lee University, Shepherd Poverty Programen_US
dc.titleIndigent Defense in Virginia: Practical and Empathic Motivations for Reformen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dcterms.isPartOfRG38 - Student Papers
dc.rights.holderKyle, Peter
dc.subject.fastDiscrimination in criminal justice administrationen_US
dc.subject.fastJusticeen_US
dc.subject.fastLegal assistance to the pooren_US
dc.subject.fastPublic defenders -- Evaluationen_US
dc.subject.fastPublic defenders -- Costsen_US
dc.subject.fastRight to counselen_US
dc.subject.fastSocial justiceen_US
dc.subject.fastVirginiaen_US
dc.subject.fastVirginia Indigent Defense Commissionen_US
local.departmentShepherd Poverty Programen_US
local.scholarshiptypeCapstoneen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record