Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseIn Copyrighten_US
dc.creatorGill, Caroline H.
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-03T19:15:02Z
dc.date.available2016-02-03T19:15:02Z
dc.date.created2014
dc.identifierWLURG38_Gill_POV_2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11021/32774
dc.descriptionCaroline H. Gill is a member of the Class of 2014 of Washington and Lee University.en_US
dc.descriptionCapstone; [FULL-TEXT RESTRICTED TO WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY LOGIN]en_US
dc.description.abstractU.S. tax expenditures represent $1.2 trillion dollars of lost federal tax revenues in 2013 due to exclusions, deductions, deferrals, and credits allowed by the tax code. Without tax expenditures, the US government would collect enough additional tax revenue to budget for nondefense discretionary spending twice over again. This paper asks how necessary tax expenditures are as they are written in the tax code today, what is the regressive impact of these tax expenditures, have they become more or less regressive over time, and can these tax expenditures be made more progressive while still preserving their original intent? First, this paper reviews the size, structure, value, and composition of tax expenditures as a whole. Then, this paper explains the design, purpose, legislative history, growth, and progressivity/regressivity of six selected tax expenditures (earned income tax credit, child tax credit, exclusion for pension earnings and contributions, mortgage interest deduction, exclusion for employer-provided health insurance, and the preferential rates on capital gains). After commenting on overall historical trends of regressivity, the paper discusses and recommends policies that increase the progressivity of tax expenditures while preserving their original policy intent.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityCaroline Gill
dc.format.extent31 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsThis material is made available for use in research, teaching, and private study, pursuant to U.S. Copyright law. The user assumes full responsibility for any use of the materials, including but not limited to, infringement of copyright and publication rights of reproduced materials. Any materials used should be fully credited with the source.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.subject.otherWashington and Lee University, Shepherd Poverty Programen_US
dc.titleSelected U.S. Tax Expenditures: Historical Trends in Regressivityen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dcterms.isPartOfRG38 - Student Papers
dc.rights.holderGill, Caroline H.
dc.subject.fastTax expendituresen_US
dc.subject.fastProgressive taxationen_US
dc.subject.fastEarned income tax crediten_US
dc.subject.fastChild tax creditsen_US
dc.subject.fastTax deductionsen_US
local.departmentShepherd Poverty Programen_US
local.scholarshiptypeCapstoneen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record