Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseIn Copyrighten_US
dc.creatorLeary, Richard William
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-23T14:30:36Z
dc.date.available2022-05-23T14:30:36Z
dc.date.created2022
dc.identifierWLURG38_Leary_HIST_2022
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11021/35863
dc.descriptionThesis; [FULL-TEXT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOLLOWING A 5-YEAR EMBARGO]en_US
dc.descriptionRichard William Leary is a member of the Class of 2022 of Washington and Lee University.en_US
dc.description.abstractIreland experienced numerous forms of land redistribution throughout its history due to intermittent invasions. Viking and Norman groups each conquered sections of the island from the 800s to 1200s CE, and the Tudor monarchs of England solidified de jure authority when Henry VIII was proclaimed King of Ireland in 1542 CE. However, none of these groups totally supplanted native Irish control. Plantation was the principal policy begun during the Tudor monarchs and greatly expanded by the subsequent Stuart monarchs to gain control over the land and people of Ireland. In all its iterations, plantation was essentially the confiscation of native Irish land for the settlement of British colonists. Historians such as Nicholas Canny and Jane Ohlmeyer emphasize the role of plantation in Ireland as Britain's first colonial expansion into a larger Atlantic world.(1) As such, British plantation policies and practices in Ireland provide an opportunity to explore the origins of how colonial experiences interacted with discourses of race. This thesis argues that the racialized discourse of British elites in the Tudor-Stuart transition period of 1590-1625 CE indicates that ideas of a native Irish racial other were original to British elite experiences of plantation. English elite literature written in the 1590s branded a Gaelic-Catholic racial identity for the native Irish that would be used to justify plantation as a colonial policy. Similar themes of a racialized discourse appear in the administrative materials and institutional interactions of the period, which assumed plantation was necessary to incorporate the native Irish into a homogenous British polity. Additionally, the personal correspondence and policy petitions of British elites utilized the same racialized discourse to presuppose the necessity of plantation to make the native Irish economically profitable within a larger British polity. This thesis builds upon the work of previous historians that have emphasized Ireland's role as the first colonial experience for the eventually globe-spanning British empire. [From Introduction]en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityRichard Leary
dc.format.extent90 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsThis material is made available for use in research, teaching, and private study, pursuant to U.S. Copyright law. The user assumes full responsibility for any use of the materials, including but not limited to, infringement of copyright and publication rights of reproduced materials. Any materials used should be fully credited with the source.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.subject.otherWashington and Lee University -- Honors in Historyen_US
dc.titleThe Original Sin: English Discourses of Race and Plantation in Ireland, 1590-1625 (thesis)en_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dcterms.isPartOfRG38 - Student Papers
dc.rights.holderLeary, Richard William
dc.subject.fastLand settlement -- Government policyen_US
dc.subject.fastIrelanden_US
dc.subject.fastRace discriminationen_US
dc.subject.fastIndigenous peoples -- British coloniesen_US
local.departmentHistoryen_US
local.scholarshiptypeHonors Thesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record