Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseIn Copyrighten_US
dc.creatorConover, Emma
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-06T11:55:53Z
dc.date.available2023-09-06T11:55:53Z
dc.date.created2023
dc.identifierWLURG038_Conover_POV_2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.wlu.edu/handle/11021/36230
dc.descriptionCapstone; [FULL-TEXT AVAILABLE]en_US
dc.descriptionEmma Conover is a member of the Class of 2024 of Washington and Lee University.en_US
dc.description.abstractBecause of rich environmental, linguistic, and cultural history and culture, NGOs and government agencies in Latin America have been studying and implementing cultural knowledge restoration for decades. This investigation aims to measure the efficacy in implementation of these systems, and suggests how future projects could be better executed. Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) is the generalized field of study regarding implementation of cultural knowledge. . . . Decimation of cultural knowledge, traditions, and peoples is also a poverty related issue. Traditional economic systems in the Andes have been replaced by a globalized, capitalistic model, where indigenous communities typically lack sovereignty over their assets. Assets not only include businesses and investments, but social capital, environment, and cultural institutions. In Latin America, indigenous peoples are twice as likely to experience poverty than those who identify as mestizo. Indigenous peoples are also substantially more likely to feel adverse effects of climate change, making global warming a significant social determinant of health for indigenous populations (Lines, 2019). The efficacy of traditional ecological knowledge is of pressing importance, if it can be proven to serve as a means of protection for land and people. This paper focuses on two case studies of examples of attempted restoration of cultural knowledge through agricultural practices; raised agricultural beds in Peru and potato agriculture. The efficacy of these projects are expressed in the analysis section by the metrics of longevity, externalities, agricultural production, and social effects. In conjunction with measures of adherence to locally-led development, this paper will aim to measure how well these development standards can account for project efficacy. [From Introduction]en_US
dc.format.extent30 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsThis material is made available for use in research, teaching, and private study, pursuant to U.S. Copyright law. The user assumes full responsibility for any use of the materials, including but not limited to, infringement of copyright and publication rights of reproduced materials. Any materials used should be fully credited with the source.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.subject.otherWashington and Lee University, Shepherd Poverty Programen_US
dc.titleDecolonize the Soil: Case Studies in the Restoration of Traditional Ecological Knowledgeen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dcterms.isPartOfRG38 - Student Papersen_US
dc.rights.holderConover, Emma
dc.subject.fastTraditional ecological knowledgeen_US
dc.subject.fastDecolonizationen_US
dc.subject.fastGroup identityen_US
local.embargo.termsen_US
local.departmentShepherd Poverty Programen_US
local.scholarshiptypeCapstoneen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record