Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseIn Copyrighten_US
dc.creatorDriscoll, Henry Charles
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-20T17:40:16Z
dc.date.available2023-10-20T17:40:16Z
dc.date.created2000
dc.identifierWLURG038_Driscoll_thesis_2000
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.wlu.edu/handle/11021/36351
dc.description.abstractKantian autonomy and Heideggerian authenticity each have a place in a human life. To show this I must show how the two complement each other and how they differ. To show that authenticity does not conflict with autonomy, and autonomy does not impede authenticity, I will focus on the differences between two fundamental kinds of human lacking and how autonomy and authenticity deal with each. By the end of my project, I will show how they have complementary roles in fulfilling a life which for the most part affects other people. [From introductory section]en_US
dc.format.extent48 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsThis material is made available for use in research, teaching, and private study, pursuant to U.S. Copyright law. The user assumes full responsibility for any use of the materials, including but not limited to, infringement of copyright and publication rights of reproduced materials. Any materials used should be fully credited with the source.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.subject.otherWashington and Lee University -- Honors in Philosophyen_US
dc.title"...but what to do with the guilt?" Kantian Autonomy, Heideggerian Authenticity, and Human Lackingen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dcterms.isPartOfWLURG038 - Student Papersen_US
dc.rights.holderDriscoll, Henry Charlesen_US
dc.subject.fastKant, Immanuel, 1724-1804en_US
dc.subject.fastHeidegger, Martin, 1889-1976en_US
dc.subject.fastAutonomy (Philosophy)en_US
dc.subject.fastAuthenticity (Philosophy)en_US
local.departmentPhilosophyen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record